2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2014.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on the effect of reactor internal structure geometry modeling methods on the prediction accuracy for PWR internal flow distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent years have seen Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods increasingly applied to single phase flow simulation in complex geometries relevant to nuclear engineering. To name just a few, Höhne et al (Höhne, et al 2008) simulated the mixing of de-borated slugs of water through the ROCOM facility, Lee et al (Lee, et al 2014) studied the effect of PWR internals on core inlet flow, and Jeong et al (Jeong and Han 2008) simulated the flow field in downcomer and lower plenum of a PWR, explicitly accounting for reactor internals. The enduring trend of increasing availability of computational resources continues to add larger, higher resolution models to the class of tractable problems.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have seen Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods increasingly applied to single phase flow simulation in complex geometries relevant to nuclear engineering. To name just a few, Höhne et al (Höhne, et al 2008) simulated the mixing of de-borated slugs of water through the ROCOM facility, Lee et al (Lee, et al 2014) studied the effect of PWR internals on core inlet flow, and Jeong et al (Jeong and Han 2008) simulated the flow field in downcomer and lower plenum of a PWR, explicitly accounting for reactor internals. The enduring trend of increasing availability of computational resources continues to add larger, higher resolution models to the class of tractable problems.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass flow rates in center fuel assemblies are higher than that in peripheral fuel assemblies at core inlets [13]. Many researchers have made detailed analysis on the coolant mixing in the reactor, flow field in the reactor pressure vessel, flow distribution at core inlets using CFD methods [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], however the behavior of single pellet in a reactor nuclear, PWR type, due to variation on inlet temperature and mass flow rate has not been investigated as a fundamental study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, however, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methods have been increasingly applied to the simulation of single phase flow in complex geometries relevant to nuclear engineering. To name just a few, Höhne et al [5] simulated the mixing of de-borated slugs of water through the ROCOM facility, Lee et al [6] studied the effect of PWR internals on core inlet flow, and Jeong et al [7] simulated the flow field in downcomer and lower plenum of a PWR, explicitly accounting for reactor internals. The enduring trend of increasing availability of computational resources continues to add larger, higher resolution models to the class of tractable problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%