Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Gingival Retraction using Polyvinyl Acetate Strips and Conventional Retraction Cord – An in Vivo Study

Abstract

Statement of Problem:A new material is proposed in dentistry in the form of strips for producing gingival retraction. The clinical efficacy of the material remains untested. Purpose of the Study:This study aimed to determine whether the polyvinyl acetate strips are able to effectively displace the gingival tissues in comparison with the conventional retraction cord. Material and Methods:Complete metal ceramic preparation with supra-gingival margin was performed in fourteen maxillary incisors and gingival retraction was done using Merocel strips and conventional retraction cords alternatively in 2 weeks time interval. The amount of displacement was compared using a digital vernier caliper of 0.01mm accuracy. Results were analyzed statistically using Paired students t-test. Results:The statistical analysis of the data revealed that both the conventional retraction cord and the Merocel strip produce significant retraction. Among both the materials, Merocel proved to be significantly more effective. Conclusion:Merocel strip produces more gingival displacement than the conventional retraction cord.

Awareness On Recent Advances in Gingival Retraction Materials During Impression Making Among Undergraduate Dental Students - A Questionnaire Survey

“…77% were aware of retraction cord. Shivasakthy et al, (Shivasakthy, 2013) also found in their study that most of the dentists were aware of the retraction cords. Also xhonga FA and Kannan A(xhonga, 1971;Kannan and Venugopalan, 2018) found similar results.…”

Gingival Retraction Methods: A Systematic Review

“…Only eleven studies satisfied the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. One study was later excluded on the basis of its quality, as the results were inappropriately reported. The authors of that study were consulted for clarification of the results, but no response was received.…”

Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials

“…8,9 In the present study, all the gingival retraction systems caused gingival displacement of more than 0.22 mm, which is the optimal displacement required for recording of gingival finish lines. 10 Hence, all the three gingival retraction systems are effective for gingival displacement. However, laser retraction system was the most effective among the three and least amount of displacement was caused by magic foam.…”