Comparative study on the measurement of learning outcomes after powerpoint presentation and problem based learning with discussion in family medicine amongst fifth year medical students

Abstract

Background:Learning outcomes after traditional teaching methods were compared with problem-based learning (PBL) among fifth year medical students. Six students participated each in traditional teaching and PBL methods, respectively. Traditional teaching method involved PowerPoint (PPT) presentation and PBL included study on case scenario and discussion. Both methods were effective in improving performance of students. Postteaching, we did not find significant differences in learning outcomes between these two teaching methods.Aims:(1) Study was conducted with an intention to find out which method of learning is more effective; traditional or PBL. (2) To assess the level of knowledge and understanding in anemia/zoonotic diseases as against diabetes/hypertension.Settings and Design:All the students posted from February 3, 2014, to March 14, 2014, participated in this study. Six students were asked to prepare and present a lecture (PPT) and subsequent week other six students were asked to present PBL. Both groups presented different topics. Since it was a pre- and post-test, same students were taken as control. To maintain uniformity and to avoid bias due cultural diversity, language etc., same questions were administered.Materials and Methods:After taking verbal consent, all 34 students were given pretest on anemia and zoonotic diseases. Then lecture (PPT) by six students on the same topic was given it followed by posttest questionnaire. Subsequent week pretest was conducted on hypertension and diabetes. Then case scenario presentation and discussion (PBL) was done by different six students followed by posttest. Both the methods were compared.Statistical Analysis:Analysis was done manually and standard error of means and students t-test was used to find out statistical significance.Results:We found statistically significant improvement in performance of students after PPT presentation as well as PBL. Both methods are equally effective. However, Pretest results of students in anemia and zoonotic diseases (Group A) were poor compared to pretest results of students in hypertension and diabetes (Group B). The students who participated in presentation did not influence their performance as they were covering a small part of the topic and there were no differences in their marks compared to other students.Conclusions:We did not find significant differences in outcome after teaching between PBL and traditional methods. Performances of students were poor in anemia and zoonotic diseases which need remedial teaching. Assessment may influence retention ability and performance.

The effectiveness of problem-based learning in gynecology and obstetrics education in China

“…Nowadays, it has been widely used in many training programs under various circumstances. [ 3 ] As shown in the previous literature, [ 4 – 6 ] PBL students would sometimes outperform the students with traditional teaching methods, but sometimes did not. Besides, the results would also be different when considering the different outcomes such as knowledge- and skills-related outcomes.…”

Effect of Problem-based Learning Approach on Achievement in Science among IX Graders

“…;Charif (2010);Üce and Ates (2016);Zakariya, Ibrahim, and Adisa (2016);Awan, Hussain, and Anwar (2017);Merritt, Lee, Rillero, and Kinach (2017);Thakur (2017);Umanailo (2019);Fidan and Tunsel (2019);Bara and Xhomara (2020);Kaur (2021); and Funa and Prudente (2021) reveal significant positive effect of problem-based learning on achievement in science Hodges (2010),Crowley (2015),. andKhobragade, Abas, and Khobragade (2016), on the other hand, find no significant effect of problem-based learning on science achievement.…”

A compatible model of family medicine residency training in Iran

“…In the recent decade, the medical education system to train FMRs has been focused on several modern methods such as task-based learning (TBL), problem-based learning (PBL), context-based learning (CBL), guided-discovery learning (GDL) and small group teaching (SGT) (Jantsch et al, 2017;Khobragade et al, 2016;Karimi Moonaghi, 2015;Khoja, 2015;Schutte et al, 2015). These student-oriented learning approaches are compatible with all training health centers (THCs) to develop critical thinking, creativity and selfconfidence in FMRs (Jantsch et al, 2017;Karimi Moonaghi, 2015).…”