2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study on the static and dynamic characteristics of four types of PMFCLs for large capacity applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2000, Mukhopadhyay et al [37] proposed a method of using permanent magnets to provide DC bias MMF in an SCFCL and proved the clipping performance of PMFCLs. A new type of PMFCL was proposed in [38].…”
Section: Classification Of Scfclsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2000, Mukhopadhyay et al [37] proposed a method of using permanent magnets to provide DC bias MMF in an SCFCL and proved the clipping performance of PMFCLs. A new type of PMFCL was proposed in [38].…”
Section: Classification Of Scfclsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical approach fall short of calculating the core saturation depth of such devices which is a crucial design parameter [7] [8]. Recently, many PMFCL designs are introduced [4] [6], these designs are mainly address the topology of the magnetic circuit. The numerical approach design of PMFCL was reported in [5], 2D FEM software was used in the designs of PMFCL, the FEM magnetostatic solver was the design tool in the analysis of excitation system of many proposed PMFCL configurations.…”
Section: Pmfcl Magnetic Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extraction results were then obtained through an energy minimization process applying Markov random field. In addition, there are some models adopted to PTT detection, such as the G0 statistical clustering model [13] and spherically invariant random vector model [14]. However, the results of general preprocessing methods (like multi-look processing and spatial filtering) when using CFAR to detect point targets are not satisfactory under complex ground scenes [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%