2021
DOI: 10.7712/120121.8703.19294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Study on Two Analytical Mechanical-Based Methods for Deriving Fragility Curves Targeted to Masonry School Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting overview and discussion on the analogies and differences among different approaches, i.e., if empirical, mechanical-analytical, mechanical-numerical, or hybrid, is provided in [88,89], while in [90], a focus on analytical methodologies to derive vulnerability functions is presented. Among the mechanical-analytical approaches, some proposals specifically developed for RC structures are presented in [91][92][93][94], while those specifically for URM are developed in the works by [73,[95][96][97][98]. However, the limited number of buildings that compose the SLC MIN system, at least compared with the interfering buildings, makes it feasible to also apply mechanicalanalytical approaches, which are based on a limited number of geometrical and mechanical parameters.…”
Section: Risk Class From Si (Ls Ls) Risk Class From Ealmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…An interesting overview and discussion on the analogies and differences among different approaches, i.e., if empirical, mechanical-analytical, mechanical-numerical, or hybrid, is provided in [88,89], while in [90], a focus on analytical methodologies to derive vulnerability functions is presented. Among the mechanical-analytical approaches, some proposals specifically developed for RC structures are presented in [91][92][93][94], while those specifically for URM are developed in the works by [73,[95][96][97][98]. However, the limited number of buildings that compose the SLC MIN system, at least compared with the interfering buildings, makes it feasible to also apply mechanicalanalytical approaches, which are based on a limited number of geometrical and mechanical parameters.…”
Section: Risk Class From Si (Ls Ls) Risk Class From Ealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting overview and discussion on the analogies and differences among different approaches, i.e., if empirical, mechanical-analytical, mechanical-numerical, or hybrid, is provided in [88,89], while in [90], a focus on analytical methodologies to derive vulnerability functions is presented. Among the mechanical-analytical approaches, some proposals specifically developed for RC structures are presented in [91][92][93][94], while those specifically for URM are developed in the works by [73,[95][96][97][98].…”
Section: Risk Class From Si (Ls Ls) Risk Class From Ealmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations