2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative study using RSM and ANN modelling for performance-emission prediction of CI engine fuelled with bio-diesohol blends: A fuzzy optimization approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there has not been any application of this type of methodology comparison in the study of microalgae carbohydrate accumulation. Several studies exhibited higher R 2 values from the ANN models, however, other researchers have reported otherwise 18,36‐40 . In this study, the ANN model had a higher R 2 value (0.99588) than the RSM models (0.9873).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there has not been any application of this type of methodology comparison in the study of microalgae carbohydrate accumulation. Several studies exhibited higher R 2 values from the ANN models, however, other researchers have reported otherwise 18,36‐40 . In this study, the ANN model had a higher R 2 value (0.99588) than the RSM models (0.9873).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Several studies exhibited higher R 2 values from the ANN models, however, other researchers have reported otherwise. 18,[36][37][38][39][40] In this study, the ANN model had a higher R 2 value (0.99588) than the RSM models (0.9873). However, it is worth noting that while the RSM model has a lower R 2 value between the two investigated models in this study, it still revealed high R 2 , R 2 adj , and R 2 pred values while requiring a lesser number of experimental runs using the CCD.…”
Section: Ann Modeling and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Furthermore, greater atomization of the fuel, advanced evaporation, and oxygen content in biodiesel enhanced the CP. 69 , 70 As a result of the various cetane index values, there is a significant difference in ignition delay between other blends and B20 fuels. As a consequence of CuO nanoparticle dissemination in B20, the CP was improved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reang et al [37] found that blending D75B20RW5 with biodiesel shows 8% higher brake thermal efficiency and 3.33% lower BSFC compared to diesel. Whereas Dey et al [38] found that the D85B10E5 was the most optimal mix at 100% engine loading performance. Based on the gray-fuzzy approach with the Taguchi method, the most optimum engine parameter is found in the D85B10E5 mixture at 100% [39].…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 93%