1932
DOI: 10.1080/00221309.1932.9918468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Suggestibility in the Trance and Waking States—a Further Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1941
1941
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conundrum centers on findings indicating that the induction of hypnosis has little impact on responsiveness to suggestion and that hypnotizability scales, therefore, probably measure the effects of suggestion, not the effects of hypnosis (cf. Barber & Glass, 1962;Braffman & Kirsch, 1999Caster & Baker, 1932;Glass & Barber, 1961;Weitzenhoffer & Sjoberg, 1961;Williams, 1930).…”
Section: Response To Torem Suggestion Undefined: On the Limitations Omentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The conundrum centers on findings indicating that the induction of hypnosis has little impact on responsiveness to suggestion and that hypnotizability scales, therefore, probably measure the effects of suggestion, not the effects of hypnosis (cf. Barber & Glass, 1962;Braffman & Kirsch, 1999Caster & Baker, 1932;Glass & Barber, 1961;Weitzenhoffer & Sjoberg, 1961;Williams, 1930).…”
Section: Response To Torem Suggestion Undefined: On the Limitations Omentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Biermann (8) says: "In very deep hypnosis there may be a lessening, sometimes a lack, of suggestibility." Caster and Baker (13) report that 2 of their 10 subjects showed negative suggestibility in the trance! Is HYPNOSIS A DISSOCIATED STATE?…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%