1983
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1983.01390120005003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Tissue Reactivity to Topical Hemostatic Agents in the Periureteral Area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficacy of different hemostatic agents has been evaluated in animals, 1,5,6,21,25 and tissue responses have been reported for a variety of sites. 7,18,19,24 In in vivo studies of hemostatic efficacy, collagen-based agents have generally proved superior to gelatin-and cellulose-based agents, despite different handling characteristics. 1,11,20,24 Comparative in vitro studies yielded a similar overall ranking: collagen-based agents (sponges or microfibrils) exceeded Gelfoam, which in turn worked more effectively than oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel).…”
Section: Hemostatic Agents In Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficacy of different hemostatic agents has been evaluated in animals, 1,5,6,21,25 and tissue responses have been reported for a variety of sites. 7,18,19,24 In in vivo studies of hemostatic efficacy, collagen-based agents have generally proved superior to gelatin-and cellulose-based agents, despite different handling characteristics. 1,11,20,24 Comparative in vitro studies yielded a similar overall ranking: collagen-based agents (sponges or microfibrils) exceeded Gelfoam, which in turn worked more effectively than oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel).…”
Section: Hemostatic Agents In Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,18,19,24 In in vivo studies of hemostatic efficacy, collagen-based agents have generally proved superior to gelatin-and cellulose-based agents, despite different handling characteristics. 1,11,20,24 Comparative in vitro studies yielded a similar overall ranking: collagen-based agents (sponges or microfibrils) exceeded Gelfoam, which in turn worked more effectively than oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel). 23 Oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel), a homogeneous soft knitted gauze, is the absorbable topical hemostatic agent preferred in cranial surgery.…”
Section: Hemostatic Agents In Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gelatin sponge is made of a protein extracted from the collagen found inside the connective tissues of animals and is often used for its hemostatic properties in medical procedures (15). Gelatin sponge has a high affinity for living tissues and is absorbable in vivo within a few months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics of gelatin sponge make it particularly advantageous for use in regenerating BDs of the EAM. As a final consideration, it is also very important to optimize the regenerative conditions (5,15,16). In the last step of our procedure, we seal the gelatin sponge with a fibrin glue to insulate it from the outside creating optimal regenerative conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aunque es preferible retirar la gasa de celulosa oxidada una vez se consigue la hemostasia deseada, puede dejarse intencionadamente en el campo quirúrgico (para facilitar la hemostasia o como rutina preventiva, para evitar el rezumado hemático post-operatorio, tal como se recomienda para la hemostasia del lecho de la nefrectomía parcial laparoscópica), pues se absorbe sin causar reacción fibrótica o inflamatoria significativa, ni aún en presencia de orina estéril 4 . Pequeñas colecciones de aire atrapados en el intersticio de la gasa pueden detectarse hasta más de un mes después de la intervención 2 , y podrían confundirse con un absceso bacteriano, aunque en éste el número de burbujas de gas suele ser más numeroso y es típica la existencia de niveles hidroaéreos.…”
Section: Comentariounclassified