2014
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.12375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative Visualization of Molecular Surfaces Using Deformable Models

Abstract: The comparison of molecular surface attributes is of interest for computer aided drug design and the analysis of biochemical simulations. Due to the non‐rigid nature of molecular surfaces, partial shape matching is feasible for mapping two surfaces onto each other. We present a novel technique to obtain a mapping relation between two surfaces using a deformable model approach. This relation is used for pair‐wise comparison of local surface attributes (e.g. electrostatic potential). We combine the difference va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarikaya et al also take into account the residue scale, by visualizing classifier performance with respect to protein chains on which a classifier has operated [SAMG14]. Finally, to communicate the differences of surface projected parameters, Scharnowski et al propose to use deformable models [SKR*14]. Our goal is to provide a compact representation that conveys a larger set of data features (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarikaya et al also take into account the residue scale, by visualizing classifier performance with respect to protein chains on which a classifier has operated [SAMG14]. Finally, to communicate the differences of surface projected parameters, Scharnowski et al propose to use deformable models [SKR*14]. Our goal is to provide a compact representation that conveys a larger set of data features (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarikaya et al also take into account the residue scale, by visualizing classifier performance with respect to protein chains on which a classifier has operated [42]. Finally, to communicate the differences of surface projected parameters, Scharnowski et al propose to use deformable models [44]. 2D molecular interaction visualization.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It, however, has difficulty in handling objects with different topologies. DFI approaches, on the other hand, represent the shape as an isosurface, which does not require dense surface correspondences and allows topological change without special treatment. However, DFI approaches are computationally intensive, which are thus less suitable for practical application.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%