Compare the Efficacy of Two Commercially Available Mouthrinses in reducing Viable Bacterial Count in Dental Aerosol produced during Ultrasonic Scaling when used as a Preprocedural Rinse

Shetty, Shamila; Sharath, K S; Shenoy, Santhosh; Sreekumar, Chandini; Shetty, Rashmi N; Thomas, Biju

doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1414

Cited by 31 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Study reported by Yadav et al reported that CHX 0.2% was highly effective in inhibiting sub gingival plaque formation and hence prevents development of gingivitis [18]. In accordance with our study, Shamila et al reported that Chlorhexidine mouthwash was more effective than herbal mouth rinse in reducing microbial load of aerosols [25].…”

Section: Table 1 Comparison Of Cfu Count Mean Standard Deviation Ansupporting

confidence: 91%

Efficacy of Two Mouth Rinses in Reducing Aerosol Bacterial Load during Ultrasonic Scaling

Anjum

Hosein

Butt

et al. 2019

JAMMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims:The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two mouth washes namely Chlorhexidine 0.2% and 5% green tea mouth rinse when used as pre-procedural rinses in reducing the number of CFU in aerosol generated during ultrasonic scaling. Methodology: 70 subjects were recruited in this study (43 males, 27 females: age range 18-65 years with presence of minimum 20 permanent functional teeth, less than 5 mm mean probing depth and plaque and gingival score between 1-3. Subjects were randomly divided into two groups, group 1 and group 2. Each group comprised of 35 patients. A split mouth design technique was used for collecting the aerosol samples on blood agar Anjum et al.; JAMMR, 31 (7): 1-9, 2019; Article no.JAMMR.53094 2 plates. For every patient, there was a control side and test side of mouth. Ultrasonic scaling was done on control side without pre procedural rinsing and vice versa. Group 1 used 0.2% Chlorhexidine while group 2 rinsed with 5% green tea mouthwash. The blood agar plates were then transported to Microbiology lab and incubated for counting the colony forming units (CFU). Results: Significant reduction of CFU occurred with pre procedural rinsing with both mouthwashes as compared to non-rinsing before ultrasonic scaling and 0.2% Chlorhexidine found to be superior to 5% green tea in reducing bacterial load in aerosol samples Conclusion: Pre procedural mouth rinsing with effective mouthwashes significantly reduces aerosol contamination and should be used before all dental procedures that results in formation of aerosols and splatters along with some other infection control protocol to minimize the risks of cross infection in clinical settings. Original Research Article

show abstract

Section: Table 1 Comparison Of Cfu Count Mean Standard Deviation Ansupporting

confidence: 91%

Efficacy of Two Mouth Rinses in Reducing Aerosol Bacterial Load during Ultrasonic Scaling

Anjum

Hosein

Butt

et al. 2019

JAMMR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…From this result, can be stated that the farther distance from reference point (patient's oral cavity) then the less of bacterial aerosol quantity. It is in line with a research conducted by Logothethis and Martinez 20 showed that the number of cfus decrease with increasing the distance from the reference point. Nevertheless, the result of group I was not in line with group II.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Shetty et al 20 about the efficacy of pre-procedural mouth rinses (chlorhexidine gluconate and tea tree oil) in reducing microbial content of aerosol product during ultrasonic scaling procedures by viable bacterial count. The results showed that all the antiseptic mouthwash significantly reduced the bacterial cfus.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Difference of Bacterial Aerosol Quantity Based on Blood Agar Plate Position

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference of bacterial aerosol quantity based on blood agarplate position with and without using chlorhexidine as pre-procedural mouthwash in ultrasonic scaling treatment. Methods:The 16 samples rinsed using chlorhexidine and other 16 samples rinsed using sterile water before ultrasonic scaling treatment was started. Bacterial aerosol was collected using blood agar plate for 10 minutes during ultrasonic scaling treatment and placed at three different positions: chest of patient (P-I), right side of patient-8 o'clock (P-II), left side of patient-4 o'clock (P-III). Results:The Friedman test result showed that p= 0.223 (group I) and p< 0.001 (group II). The p= 0.223 showed that there was no significant difference of bacterial aerosol quantity based on blood agar plate position. Conclusion:Chlorhexidine can be used on bacterial aerosol reduction during ultrasonic scaling treatment.

show abstract

“…Razão da exclusão dos estudos (n = 08) Retamal Valdez et al, Gupta et al,2014Shetty et al,2013Feres et al,2010Dawson et al,2016Klyn et al,2001Logothetis, Martinez-Welles 1995Monserrate, 1970 Não apresentaram dados da UFC antes do uso de enxaguatórios bucais.…”

Section: Registros Removidos Após Duplicatasunclassified

“…No total, 367 indivíduos foram incluídos. Na maioria dos estudos, o dispositivo gerador de aerossol foi o aparelho ultrassônico (Retamal-Valdes et al, 2017, Gupta et al, 2014, Shetty et al, 2013, Feres et al, 2010, Klyn et al, 2001, Fine et al, 1993aestudo 1, Fine et al, 1993aestudo 2, Fine et al, 1993be Fine et al, 1992. Nos demais estudos, os aerossóis foram gerados por baixa rotação para polimento de superfícies dentárias (Logothetis;Martinez-Welles, 1995), caneta de alta rotação para preparo de cavidades dentárias (Mohammed;Monserrate, 1970) e caneta de baixa rotação para remoção de aparelhos ortodônticos (Dawson et al, 2016).…”

Section: Características Dos Estudosunclassified

Eficácia de enxaguatórios bucais pré-procedimento na redução de microrganismos no aerossol: uma revisão sistemática

Marui¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Compare the Efficacy of Two Commercially Available Mouthrinses in reducing Viable Bacterial Count in Dental Aerosol produced during Ultrasonic Scaling when used as a Preprocedural Rinse

Cited by 31 publications

References 6 publications

Efficacy of Two Mouth Rinses in Reducing Aerosol Bacterial Load during Ultrasonic Scaling

Efficacy of Two Mouth Rinses in Reducing Aerosol Bacterial Load during Ultrasonic Scaling

The Difference of Bacterial Aerosol Quantity Based on Blood Agar Plate Position

Eficácia de enxaguatórios bucais pré-procedimento na redução de microrganismos no aerossol: uma revisão sistemática

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About