2015
DOI: 10.1002/pfi.21501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing a Few Behavior Engineering Models

Abstract: It is almost impossible to imagine Gilbert\u27s behavior engineering model as other than a fundamental component of the field of performance improvement as we know it. The behavior engineering model has been freely used, reused, and reconfigured for various purposes by individuals in the field. This is so common that sometimes it is difficult to determine what is new or what is just being copied between versions. Here, three variants of the behavior engineering model are briefly compared. Unique features are i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Gilbert's original BEM is appropriate for investigating issues that are believed to operate at the level of individual and small group performance, Chevalier's revised BEM puts more emphasis on employee motives and incentives as a driver for performance change without appearing to alter the efficacy of other BEM categories. In fact, Chevalier's effort to revise the BEM emphasizes that environmental and individual factors must be addressed in tandem to support the efficacy and sustainability of any intervention (Chevalier, ; Winiecki, ). Thus, adoption of Chevalier's revision of the BEM requires us to consider that incentives (an environmental factor) influence and may even produce changes in motives (an individual factor), and thus must be addressed together.…”
Section: A Systemic Approach To Cause Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While Gilbert's original BEM is appropriate for investigating issues that are believed to operate at the level of individual and small group performance, Chevalier's revised BEM puts more emphasis on employee motives and incentives as a driver for performance change without appearing to alter the efficacy of other BEM categories. In fact, Chevalier's effort to revise the BEM emphasizes that environmental and individual factors must be addressed in tandem to support the efficacy and sustainability of any intervention (Chevalier, ; Winiecki, ). Thus, adoption of Chevalier's revision of the BEM requires us to consider that incentives (an environmental factor) influence and may even produce changes in motives (an individual factor), and thus must be addressed together.…”
Section: A Systemic Approach To Cause Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, clients have an interest in making swift changes so their eff ects on the organization can be more quickly registered. Rossett (2007) and Watkins et al (2012) advocate a consultative approach that avoids attempting to pressure the client and instead off ers evidence-based reasoning to support any particular advice. Rossett (2007) emphasizes that this is not a one-and-done approach but rather something the consultant has to accomplish regularly.…”
Section: The Performance Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chevalier, in his 2003 updating of the BEM, reordered Motives as most effective among the individual factors for improving performance. While Chevalier maintained that the Information provided by management has the greatest leverage for PI, “his case example makes it apparent that there would be a lot of leverage gained if incentives and motives were linked together” (Winiecki, , p. 11).…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gilbert's initial work on the behavior engineering model raised expectations that if the first five areas were addressed, the individual's motivation would take care of itself (Dean, 1995). Winiecki (2015) observed the differences in the order of factors presented by Gilbert (1978) and Chevalier (2003). Gilbert's order of factors (2007, p. 85) reads: data, instruments, incentives, knowledge, response capacity, and motives.…”
Section: Call To Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%