2020
DOI: 10.18564/jasss.4304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Actual and Simulated HFT Traders' Behavior for Agent Design

Abstract: Recently financial markets have shown significant risks and levels of volatility. Understanding the sources of these risks require simulation models capable of representing adequately the real mechanisms of markets. In this paper, we compared data of the high-frequency-trader market-making (HFT-MM) strategy from both the real financial market and our simulation. Regarding the former, we extracted trader clusters and identified one cluster whose statistical indexes indicated HFT-MM features. We then analyzed th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The agent prefers to select buy and sell limit orders with price difference 4 and 6 and volume 5 while limit orders with price difference 0 and volume 5, market orders with volume 5, and cancel orders were rarely selected. Previous studies about high-frequency-trader and market making indicate that traders in real markets have similar investment strategies to our LV-DRL model (Hirano et al 2019). On the other hand, since the reward function of the CO-DRL model does not consider the inventory of the agent, the CO-DRL model seems to pursue a momentum-trend-following strategy without much regard for risk.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The agent prefers to select buy and sell limit orders with price difference 4 and 6 and volume 5 while limit orders with price difference 0 and volume 5, market orders with volume 5, and cancel orders were rarely selected. Previous studies about high-frequency-trader and market making indicate that traders in real markets have similar investment strategies to our LV-DRL model (Hirano et al 2019). On the other hand, since the reward function of the CO-DRL model does not consider the inventory of the agent, the CO-DRL model seems to pursue a momentum-trend-following strategy without much regard for risk.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Next, we will explain the HFT agent model in detail. Among the market making strategy models that have been proposed [51], [52], [55], we modeled the HFT agent on the basis of Kusada et al [52] for simplicity. There is only one HFT agent.…”
Section: Artificial Market Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As has been noted, the validation of artificial market models with actual data requires much work, and it would be a separate research project [35], [50], [51]. LeBaron [50] and Chen et al [35] investigated the validation of previous artificial market models by changing various factors in the models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, this dataset includes virtual server IDs, a unit of trading accounts on the TSE. Although the virtual server ID is not technically equivalent to the membership ID, we can effectively define trader IDs to track individual trader behaviour with high resolution by appropriately aggregating virtual server IDs [10,11]; see also [9] for more technical details.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%