Comparing aggregation methods in large-scale group AHP: Time for the shift to distance-based aggregation

Duleba, Szabolcs; Szádoczki, Zsombor

doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116667

Cited by 28 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The authors of the paper [19] highlight the fact that most research focused on the MCDA problem does not consider the large number of distance metrics that have the potential to be used in MCDA methods based on distance from reference objects, such as TOPSIS and CODAS. Other research also clearly demonstrates the need to explore different metrics in methods considering the distance from reference objects [24,25]. The authors of the mentioned papers point out the need to provide the decision-maker using the above-mentioned methods with a set of different distance metrics.…”

Section: Motivation and Significancementioning

confidence: 99%

pyrepo-mcda — Reference objects based MCDA software package

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Motivation and Significancementioning

confidence: 99%

pyrepo-mcda — Reference objects based MCDA software package

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) merupakan salah satu metode pendukung keputusan yang populer. Seperti teknik atau metode lainnya, metode AHP sanggup menangani pengambilan keputusan multi kriteria [14]. AHP menggunakan komparasi matriks berpasangan untuk menghitung kepentingan relatif dari kriteria dan memprioritaskan masalah yang tidak dapat dibuat struktur hirarkinya [15].…”

Section: Analytic Hierarchy Process (Ahp)unclassified

Decision Support System for Social Assistance’s Beneficiaries Using Ahp – Promethee Method in Kelurahan Karanganyar Gunung

Supriyanto

Ramadhani

2022

J. Tek. Inform. (JUTIF)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indonesia as a developing country has problems related to poverty. The government tries to overcome the problem of poverty from year to year by launching various aid programs, one of which is the Family Hope Program (PKH). The distribution of PKH social assistance (bansos) can actually help millions of beneficiaries every year, but there are also obstacles related to the lack of precise targeting of beneficiaries, which often occurs because there is no definite standard in the hierarchy of criteria for beneficiaries. Using the Decision Making System (SPK) with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) - Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) method can provide an alternative to prioritizing aid recipients to assist decisions made by officers and related office holders. The AHP method is used to weight the poverty criteria, while the PROMETHEE method is used to rank the priority of social assistance recipients. Using 45 data on prospective PKH social assistance recipients in Karanganyar Gunung Village who were selected based on 14 poverty criteria, the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) resulted in a priority ranking of social assistance recipients. The ranking is based on the netflow value, the higher the value, the higher the priority level. The ranking using this method gives results in the form of residents with the first priority of receiving social assistance with a net flow value of 0.342 owned by Sumirah followed by Meliyani Kusrini with a net flow value of 0.325.

show abstract

“…Aggregation of individual preferences is in the focus of the research, see for example (Duleba and Szádoczki 2022 ) and the detailed references in. Applying stochastic methods, our paper considers the set of match results as a data set, and aggregation concern the different subgroups of teams.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups

Orbán-Mihálykó

Mihálykó

Gyarmati

2023

Cent Eur J Oper Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ranking and rating methods have outstanding significance in sports, mainly due to their capacity to predict results. In this paper we turn to their capacity to aggregate separate groups’ rankings based on a small piece of information. We investigate under which conditions two or more separate groups can be trustworthily interwoven applying Thurstone motivated methods and an AHP based method. A theorem is proved which guarantees adequate unified ranking based on some links between the groups. We also analyse the robustness of the results.

show abstract

Comparing aggregation methods in large-scale group AHP: Time for the shift to distance-based aggregation

Cited by 28 publications

References 32 publications

pyrepo-mcda — Reference objects based MCDA software package

pyrepo-mcda — Reference objects based MCDA software package

Decision Support System for Social Assistance’s Beneficiaries Using Ahp – Promethee Method in Kelurahan Karanganyar Gunung

Evaluating the capacity of paired comparison methods to aggregate rankings of separate groups

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About