2015
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.2014.2347265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing and Combining Predictive Business Process Monitoring Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…4. Our earlier work indicated reasonably good prediction accuracy (>70%) for this point in process execution, while still leaving time to execute actions required to respond to violations or mitigate their effects [22].…”
Section: Industry Data Set and Experiments Executionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4. Our earlier work indicated reasonably good prediction accuracy (>70%) for this point in process execution, while still leaving time to execute actions required to respond to violations or mitigate their effects [22].…”
Section: Industry Data Set and Experiments Executionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We use artificial neural networks (ANNs [15]) as prediction models, which have shown good success in our earlier work [21,22]. In particular, we use multilayer perceptrons as a specific form of ANNs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations