Comparing and Discussing Positions on Scientific Literacy in Teacher Education and Lower Secondary School Curricula

Abstract

Abstract.One of the purposes of science teacher education is to provide prospective teachers with a solid foundation from which to educate scientifically literate pupils. It is reasonable to assume that curriculum documents provide opportunities as well as imposing restraints on the interpreted, enacted, and experienced curriculum. Hence, we analyse Norwegian national curricula documents for science teacher education and lower secondary education to explore how they communicate in terms of positions on scientific literacy: we explore how knowledge, knowledge processes, and values related to knowledge are configured in the documents. Our analysis is a theoretically driven content analysis inspired by discourse analysis, through which we explore the configuration of the concepts and arguments in use in the curricula. Although both curricula emphasize a similar body of knowledge, the teacher education curriculum lacks the more elaborate approaches to communication and the nature of science (NOS) that are found in the school science curriculum. Moreover, both are concerned with science as enculturation but otherwise provide different arguments for learning science. Prospective teachers might thus be ill-equipped to address vital epistemic aspects of school science.

Digital directions: Curricular goals relating to digital literacy and digital competences in the Gymnasium (stx) in Denmark.

“…Political institutions worldwide use curricula as an instrument to endorse societal changes (Nwaji, 2011;Gran, Petterson & Mølstad, 2019). A curriculum contains information about what content, activities and assessment types a specific course or educational programme should use (Johansen & Afdal, 2018;Aesert et al, 2013). Our perspective is inspired by Bernstein (1990;2000), who understands a curriculum as a product of a complex recontextualization process.…”

Learning to teach: an investigation into pre-service biology teachers' perceptions toward lesson study

“…One primary objective of science teacher education is to provide PTs with the groundwork for educating scientifically literate students (Johansen and Afdal, 2018). However, Davis et al (2006) pointed out that PTs appear to have a poor understanding of science content, particularly biology-related content (Thomson and Tippins, 2013), indicating that teacher education lacks an interdisciplinary approach to science content.…”

“…One primary objective of science teacher education is to provide PTs with the groundwork for educating scientifically literate students (Johansen and Afdal, 2018). However, Davis et al.…”

High Education and University Teaching and Learning Processes: Soft Skills

“…In the European Union, the urgent need for improvement of the quality and status of teaching and the modernization of higher education has been highlighted [ 1 , 2 ]. In this process, teachers’ competences play an essential role and it is important that future teachers are prepared to work with complex content and an increasing diversity of learners [ 3 , 4 ]. It should therefore be a priority for teachers to start with high-quality initial professional preparation [ 5 ].…”