Comparing and Evaluating Organizational Models: A Multi-agent Programming Contest Case Study

Franco, Mariana Ramos; Sichman, Jaime Simão

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25420-3_12

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Related Work1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2015

Publication Types

Select...

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We draw attention particularly to organization centered approaches: OperA+ [14] and OMACS [7]. Determining an appropriate organizational MAS design for any given scenario is an open research problem, with some taking an empirical approach [10] and others defining generic meta-models by combining existing models e.g. JaCaMo [4] and FAML [3].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing for Planned Emergence in Multi-agent Systems

Keogh

Sonenberg

2015

Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems X

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present an approach for designing organization-oriented multi-agent systems (MASs) to allow improvisation at run time when agents are not available to exactly match the original organizational design structure. Working with system components from an existing MAS organizational meta-model, OJAzzIC, the approach sets out five stages for the design process. We illustrate the design approach with an incident response scenario implemented in the Blocks World for Teams (BW4T) environment, and show how agents at runtime can improvise -for example they can adopt tasks even if those tasks do not precisely match a predefined role.

show abstract