2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10772-011-9107-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing ANN to HMM in implementing limited Arabic vocabulary ASR systems

Abstract: In this paper we investigated Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) based Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) by using limited Arabic vocabulary corpora. These limited Arabic vocabulary subsets are digits and vowels carried by specific carrier words. In addition to this, Hidden Markov Model (HMM) based ASR systems are designed and compared to two ANN based systems, namely Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) and recurrent architectures, by using the same corpora. All systems are isolated word speech recognizers. The ANN base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there are various works on Arabic/Dialect/Amazigh speech recognition with different approaches, such as [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there are various works on Arabic/Dialect/Amazigh speech recognition with different approaches, such as [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more complicated case, if there is a possibility of invalid sequences in a command in the form of a pair of words, it is possible to use a matrix that considers only valid combinations of words and generates an error message otherwise. Such a simplified approach will eliminate the use of often used in speech and command recognition, but more complex hidden Markov models (HMM) [15,16], which require higher speed and longer computation time. When using HMM, the speech signal is represented as a probabilistic process taking into account time-varying [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were obtained by researchers for other languages. Alotaibi (2012) obtained recognition results of vowels at the level of 92.13 % for Arabic (using lpc and artificial neural networks). Koulagudi et al (2012) obtained recognition results of vowels at the level of 91.4 % for Hindi (using MFCC).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%