69th EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2007 2007
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201401656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Basin Modeling to Velocity Modeling for Predicting Pressures in Deep Columbus Basin, Trinidad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modern multi-dimensional basin modeling software packages capture most mechanisms causing abnormal fluid pressures in the sub-surface (Welte et al, 1997;Kumar and Vittachi, 2007) accounting for depositional history (sedimentation rates), sand distribution and connectivity (''plumbing''), shale properties (flow retardation) and timing of salt emplacement (no flow zones). It has been demonstrated by Albertin et al (2002) that velocities based on effective stresses computed by detailed 3D basin models show excellent large-scale agreement to seismic derived velocities.…”
Section: Integration With Basin Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern multi-dimensional basin modeling software packages capture most mechanisms causing abnormal fluid pressures in the sub-surface (Welte et al, 1997;Kumar and Vittachi, 2007) accounting for depositional history (sedimentation rates), sand distribution and connectivity (''plumbing''), shale properties (flow retardation) and timing of salt emplacement (no flow zones). It has been demonstrated by Albertin et al (2002) that velocities based on effective stresses computed by detailed 3D basin models show excellent large-scale agreement to seismic derived velocities.…”
Section: Integration With Basin Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%