2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10864-017-9281-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Brief Experimental Analysis and Teacher Judgment for Selecting Early Reading Interventions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Teacher interventions conducted dialogically in this study proved to be effective in increasing the accuracy of student answers and this is in accordance with previous studies (GILBERTSON;WITT;LAFLEUR, 2007;VESS et al, 2018;WAGNER;AARON, 2017;WHEAR et al, 2013). Meanwhile, interventions conducted classically in the form of warnings before students solve problems such as those of Babai, Shalev and Stavy (2015) and Dewolf et al (2014) proved ineffective, because students continued to experience difficulties.…”
Section: S2supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Teacher interventions conducted dialogically in this study proved to be effective in increasing the accuracy of student answers and this is in accordance with previous studies (GILBERTSON;WITT;LAFLEUR, 2007;VESS et al, 2018;WAGNER;AARON, 2017;WHEAR et al, 2013). Meanwhile, interventions conducted classically in the form of warnings before students solve problems such as those of Babai, Shalev and Stavy (2015) and Dewolf et al (2014) proved ineffective, because students continued to experience difficulties.…”
Section: S2supporting
confidence: 89%
“…In academic interventions, researchers have suggested that brief AEA takes about the same amount of time (or less) as a standardized and norm-referenced test, yet has the added benefit of providing information about intervention selection (Baranek et al, 2011;Cates et al, 2006). Research suggests that information yielded by AEAs is unique and much more effective at identifying beneficial interventions than traditional teacheridentification methods (Wagner et al, 2017). Concerning problem-solving, teachers can use AEA to determine which function is most likely related to the academic deficit (Wagner et al, 2006).…”
Section: Academic Experimental Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the reasons for the student's academic deficits are likely idiosyncratic, it is important to select interventions based on diagnostic information rather than based on teacher intuition in order to better match the environmental problem to the intervention (Maggin et al, 2016;Wagner et al, 2017). One diagnostic approach to academic failure that may be successful is a functional approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, use of BEAs increases the clinician's confidence in decision making by providing more evidence for the effectiveness of the intervention. In fact, interventions selected using BEAs are more effective than those selected based on initial assessments of the academic concern (Wagner et al, 2017). BEA procedures have been developed for early writing (Burns et al, 2009), reading fluency (Doǧanay Bilgi, 2020), math (Mellott &Ardoin, 2019), andspelling (McCurdy et al, 2016).…”
Section: Math Computation Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%