2014 37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/mipro.2014.6859650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing classification models in the final exam performance prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those results are confirming the assumption that reducing the number of coefficients in periodogram to the smaller number of most commonly (frequently) used coefficients will not degrade information about observed student and on the other side, according to Figure (c), will enable time‐efficient model calculation. Model accuracies for all used algorithms listed in Tables and are comparable with accuracies found in literature sources (Kotsiantis et al ., ; Delgado et al ., ; Thai‐Nghe et al ., ; Romero et al ., ; Lykourentzou et al ., ; Kotsiantis et al ., ; Jovanović et al ., ; Gamulin et al ., ; Lara et al ., ) confirming that idea of using Fourier coefficients for student success prediction is plausible. Small differences between courses can be ascribed to the different numbers of students, student type (graduate, undergraduate, technology oriented or not), quantity and quality of resources posted at course page and so on.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those results are confirming the assumption that reducing the number of coefficients in periodogram to the smaller number of most commonly (frequently) used coefficients will not degrade information about observed student and on the other side, according to Figure (c), will enable time‐efficient model calculation. Model accuracies for all used algorithms listed in Tables and are comparable with accuracies found in literature sources (Kotsiantis et al ., ; Delgado et al ., ; Thai‐Nghe et al ., ; Romero et al ., ; Lykourentzou et al ., ; Kotsiantis et al ., ; Jovanović et al ., ; Gamulin et al ., ; Lara et al ., ) confirming that idea of using Fourier coefficients for student success prediction is plausible. Small differences between courses can be ascribed to the different numbers of students, student type (graduate, undergraduate, technology oriented or not), quantity and quality of resources posted at course page and so on.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In all models, the split validation with stratified sampling was performed, meaning that one set of data was used for model building (70%) and the other for validation of the model (30%). During the model calculation, attributes were optimized and selected with genetic algorithm because it was shown (Oreški et al ., ; Gamulin et al ., ) that the model accuracy was much higher when optimization was applied.…”
Section: Methodology and Datasetmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) is a universal statistical indicator for describing the accuracy of a model regarding predicting a phenomenon [32]. It has been widely used in education research for comparing classification algorithms and models [33,34] instead of other well-known evaluation measures such as Accuracy, F-measure, Sensitivity, Precision, etc. AUC can be defined as the probability that a classifier will rank a randomly chosen positive instance higher than a randomly chosen negative one (assuming 'positive' ranks higher than 'negative').…”
Section: Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the research which has adapted machine learning algorithms has shown that early prediction of students' grades might help to improve www.aetic.theiaer.org students' success rate, result and course selection. Gamulin et al [2] predicts students' performance for the final examination based on the machine learning and it has successfully improved the learning process. In the research, the predictions have given the chance for students and teachers to improve based on their predicted results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%