Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies 2015
DOI: 10.5220/0005491405400546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Competences on Academia and Occupational Contexts based on Similarity Measures

Abstract: Abstract:This paper is a flrst contribution of a schema to match professional and work competences through similarity measures. In this contribution we focus on the determination of connections between university proflles based in standards (body of knowledge and thesauri) similarity measures and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. Our flrst experiments pro ved that this hybrid schema got a promise results in the recognition of competency patterns in order to apply in the laboral context.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in [13] it is mentioned that knowledge was often written in a specific language with rules and algorithms that are not compatible with other Knowledge-Based Information Technology (KBE-IT) frameworks. In short, articulating an Open BOK is of paramount importance, because it is an essential step to develop an academic profession [14]. Nevertheless, a set of widely agreed guidelines on how to develop these BOKs and, more specifically, on the way to describe the knowledge, is not yet available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in [13] it is mentioned that knowledge was often written in a specific language with rules and algorithms that are not compatible with other Knowledge-Based Information Technology (KBE-IT) frameworks. In short, articulating an Open BOK is of paramount importance, because it is an essential step to develop an academic profession [14]. Nevertheless, a set of widely agreed guidelines on how to develop these BOKs and, more specifically, on the way to describe the knowledge, is not yet available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%