Comparing complex perspectives on obesity drivers: action‐driven communities and evidence‐oriented experts

Abstract

SummaryIntroductionThe Foresight obesity map represents an expert‐developed systems map describing the complex drivers of obesity. Recently, community‐led causal loop diagrams have been developed to support community‐based obesity prevention interventions. This paper presents a quantitative comparison between the Foresight obesity systems map and a community‐developed map of the drivers of obesity.MethodsVariables from a community‐developed map were coded against the thematic clusters defined in the Foresight map to allow comparison of their sizes and strength of adjoining causal relationships. Central variables were identified using techniques from network analysis. These properties were compared to understand the similarities and differences between the systems as defined by the two groups.ResultsThe community map focused on environmental influences, such as built physical activity environment (18% of variables) and social psychology (38%). The Foresight map's largest cluster was physiology (23%), a minimal focus in the community map (2%). Network analysis highlighted media and available time within both maps, but variables related to school and sporting club environments were unique to the community map.ConclusionCommunity stakeholders focus on modifiable social and environmental drivers of obesity. Capturing local perspectives is critical when using systems maps to guide community‐based obesity prevention.

Tools and analytic techniques to synthesise community knowledge in CBPR using computer-mediated participatory system modelling

“…Analytical techniques were taken from the field of NA, which has been previously demonstrated as a tool to investigate important structural elements within causal diagrams, 23,24 and the DEMATEL, which is an established analytical technique for identifying important components within complex cause-and-effect systems. 25,26 Negative polarity causal connections were inverted before and after the DEMATEL method.…”

Developing the logic framework underpinning a whole‐systems approach to childhood overweight and obesity prevention: Amsterdam Healthy Weight Approach

“…6 Whole-systems approaches (WSAs) are well placed to tackle the complex adaptive system of local environmental influences on overweight and obesity. 7 While acting within this system, programs adopting a WSA can also be understood as indivisible from the complex adaptive system. In comparison to traditional approaches which introduce predefined health interventions to targeted contexts or populations, we broadly characterize the working principles of a WSA as:…”

Does the severity of obesity influence bone density, geometry and strength in adolescents?

“…Obesity is defined as an excessive accumulation of body fat resulting from an imbalance between energy intake and energy expenditure and is influenced by a multitude of biological, cultural, political, environmental and economic drivers 1 . Paediatric obesity is today a major worldwide concern due to its association with the development of early metabolic, physical and certain psychosocial comorbidities 2,3 but also since approximately 80% of adolescents with obesity will continue to have obesity into adulthood 4 .…”