Comparing Composition Control Structures for Kaibel Distillation Columns

Abstract

Although Kaibel distillation columns are superior to conventional distillation sequences owing to smaller equipment investment and operation cost, they display high nonlinearity and this greatly increases the difficulty of achieving their tight control. To overcome this problem, four decentralized composition control structures, i.e., the CSR/QR, CSR/B, CSD/QR, and CSD/B structures, are proposed and compared based on the control of a Kaibel distillation column fractionating a methanol/ethanol/propanol/butanol quaternary mixture. These four composition control structures all include five composition control loops. While the four of them are employed to maintain the purity of the top, upper sidestream, lower sidestream, and bottom products, the remaining one is employed to minimize the energy consumption of the Kaibel distillation column by maintaining the composition of propanol at the first stage of the prefractionator. Dynamic simulation results show the CSR/QR and CSR/B structures can tightly maintain the purity of the controlled products with a small overshoot and short settling time after facing various disturbances in feed conditions, but the CSD/QR and CSD/B structures lead to oscillatory responses (the latter even shows divergent responses under individual disturbances). At the end of the article, some effective guides for developing composition control systems are given.

Numerical and Experimental Research on a Kaibel Divided-Wall Column: Design and Steady-State and Dynamic Operation

“…KDWC exhibits a great potential industrial application prospect for the separation of a four-component mixture because of its relatively simple structure and cost savings. Thus, great efforts have focused on the operability and controllability of the KDWC. − Strandberg et al investigated the stabilizing control of a KDWC by maximizing the product purity with fixed energy usage, and the liquid split ratio was found to have an impact on the column’s sensitivity to disturbances. Two operating schemes, minimizing the vapor flow rate at fixed product purities ( J = V ) and maximizing the product purities with fixed boilup rate ( J = D (1 – x D ) + S 1 (1 – x S 1 ) + S 2 (1 – x S 2 ) + B (1 – x B )), were compared to control a KDWC in Ghadrdan et al.’s work .…”