2003
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m1135
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Computer-interpretable Guideline Models: A Case-study Approach

Abstract: We identified guideline components that the CIG community could adopt as standards. Some of the participants are pursuing standardization of these components under the auspices of HL7.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
237
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 384 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
237
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant contributions in these areas include a variety of languages for the representation of guidelines (see [2], [3] for a review). Recently the focus of attention is shifting from the representation of guidelines to the integration of guideline systems in realistic healthcare settings [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant contributions in these areas include a variety of languages for the representation of guidelines (see [2], [3] for a review). Recently the focus of attention is shifting from the representation of guidelines to the integration of guideline systems in realistic healthcare settings [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPGs are published as textual guidelines, but in order to deploy them in some kind of computerized tool (e.g., a reminder system or a more complex decisionsupport system) they have to be represented in specialized languages (see [15,7] for a comparison and overview). Although different authoring/editing tools are often associated with these languages, authoring is a labor-intensive task that requires comprehensive knowledge in medical as well as computer science.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of Asbru, EON, GLIF, Guide, PROforma, PRODIGY can be found in [10]. The recent book by Ten Teije [21] represents a consensus of a large part of the computer-oriented CPG community.…”
Section: Computer Interpretable Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%