2012
DOI: 10.5539/jas.v5n1p1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Corn Stover and Switchgrass Biochar: Characterization and Sorption Properties

Abstract: A switchgrass biochar (SB) produced by fast pyrolysis and a corn stover biochar (CSB) from a slow pyrolysis process were mechanically milled and characterized. Both of these biochars are very cost-effective and originate as residues from bioenergy production and the corn industry, respectively. These two biochars were evaluated for their sorptive properties with both water and the estrogen containing compounds estrone, β-estradiol, and zearalenone via batch rebinding assays in salt solutions. Although CSB had … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3,5 Slow pyrolysis requires long holding time of at least 30 min to several hours for the feedstock to fully pyrolyse while fast pyrolysis is complete in as little as two seconds. 4,7 Flash pyrolysis requires shorter holding times than fast pyrolysis. 3 Slow pyrolysis gives maximum yield of biochar and gas but produce less liquid, while fast and flash pyrolysis produce higher liquid yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,5 Slow pyrolysis requires long holding time of at least 30 min to several hours for the feedstock to fully pyrolyse while fast pyrolysis is complete in as little as two seconds. 4,7 Flash pyrolysis requires shorter holding times than fast pyrolysis. 3 Slow pyrolysis gives maximum yield of biochar and gas but produce less liquid, while fast and flash pyrolysis produce higher liquid yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the chars exhibited stretching bands for OH (3650–3200 cm −1 ) which indicated the presence of alcohols, phenols and carboxylic acids, aliphatic v(CH) from –CH 2 groups (2950–2920 cm −1 ), C≡C (2260–2150 cm −1 ), C = C (2050–2000 cm −1 ), aryl groups (phenolic groups) (1715–1695 cm −1 ), COO – (1610–1550 cm −1 ) and CO 3 -2 (1426–1410 cm −1 ). In addition to those structures, HCs presented a wider range of groups including aliphatic v(CH) from CH 3 groups (2870–2840 cm −1 ), open-chain amides (1570–1515 cm −1 ), ether groups (1275–1200 cm −1 ) and polysaccharide region (1160–1020 cm −1 ) ( Fleming and Williams, 1966 , Johnston, 2017 , Peterson et al, 2013 ). All the chars exhibited aliphatic, OFGs and aryl groups, although the HCs spectra were generally more intense than BCs, indicating a broader surface functionality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los contenidos de nutrientes y pH del biocarbón obtenido en este experimento fueron comparables con los reportados por otros autores que usaron bajas temperaturas en la elaboración (Alonso et al, 2016;Peterson et al, 2013), estos mismos autores también han reportado el aumento en el contenido de nutrientes cuando el biocarbón es adicionado al suelo. Inicialmente el suelo usado en este trabajo tenía bajo contenido de elementos mayores y menores, y alta acidez potencial e intercambiable (Tabla 3), indicando una baja fertilidad natural; después de aplicar los tratamientos hubo disminución en los diferentes tipos de acidez (Tabla 4).…”
Section: Resultados Y Discusiónunclassified