11th International Software Product Line Conference (SPLC 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/spline.2007.4339257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Costs and Benefits of Different Test Strategies for a Software Product Line: A Study from Testo AG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, considering the number of derivable products of today's SPLs, this approach is unpractical. This expected result has been confirmed empirically (Ganesan et al 2007). …”
Section: Product-focused Testingsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…However, considering the number of derivable products of today's SPLs, this approach is unpractical. This expected result has been confirmed empirically (Ganesan et al 2007). …”
Section: Product-focused Testingsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For example, Platform efficiency [37], Relative cost to test a non-generic component [22], and Tracking degradation [28] are calculated by assigning numbers. The measures are calculated in a qualitative manner in 1% of cases.…”
Section: Criterion 4 Results Of the Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [22] evaluate issues related to the component, types of components and the relationship between them. On the other hand, there are other measures such as Binary Size, Performance and Cyclomatic Complexity proposed in [50] that do not take the compositionality into consideration.…”
Section: Criterion 7 Other Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been a number of efforts with MonteCarlo simulation techniques [24,29,30]. Though simulation approaches can be promising for sensitivity analyses, they require a sound understanding of the uncertainty in the data to define value ranges and probability distributions for the model variables, to achieve correct and useful results.…”
Section: Need For Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%