2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11218-014-9280-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing cyberbullying and school bullying among school students: prevalence, gender, and grade level differences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
8
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants in the abovementioned studies were adolescents in affluent nations who may have their own electronic devices equipped with Wi-Fi connection, whereas participants in the current research were 12-year olds, most of whom had no cell phones or computers of their own. In addition, the result of this study showing cyberbullying prevalence rate to be a lot lesser than that of traditional bullying was also consistent with findings from existing literature (Gofin & Avitzour, 2012;Lapidot-Lefler & Dolev-Cohen, 2015;Modecki et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants in the abovementioned studies were adolescents in affluent nations who may have their own electronic devices equipped with Wi-Fi connection, whereas participants in the current research were 12-year olds, most of whom had no cell phones or computers of their own. In addition, the result of this study showing cyberbullying prevalence rate to be a lot lesser than that of traditional bullying was also consistent with findings from existing literature (Gofin & Avitzour, 2012;Lapidot-Lefler & Dolev-Cohen, 2015;Modecki et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The same was true for Singaporean children in one study (Kwan & Skoric, 2012). Cyberbullying, though becoming controversial recently with a number of youth suicides, was said to be less prevalent than that of traditional or face-to-face bullying (Chen, 2015;Gofin & Avitrzour, 2012;Lapidot-Lefler & Dolev-Cohen, 2015;Modecki, Minchin, Harbaugh, Guerra, & Runions, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Specifically, young people may retaliate to: Reduce the negative emotions associated with being a victim of cyber bullying (Varjas et al, 2010) or demonstrate to peers that they are not an easy target to prevent further reprisals (König et al, 2010). The level of similarity in the cyber bullying behaviours that this group of young people receive and make is perhaps unsurprising given that cyber bullying is not constrained by geographical proximity (Kite, Gable, & Filippelli, 2010) and some of the power dynamics associated with face-to-face bullying are neutralised by technology (Lapidot-Lefler & Dolev-Cohen, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although research on traditional bullying shows that bullying is more common among boys, as discussed in Sanchez et al (2016), for cyberbullying, findings are mixed. Several studies report that males are indeed more likely to be cyberbullies than their female counterparts (Li, 2006;Lapidot-Lefler & Dolev-Cohen, 2015); yet, others report no gender differences (Patchin & Hinduja, 2006) and others claim that girls outnumber boys (Keith & Martin, 2005;Kowalski & Limber, 2007). In a study of 2186 middle and high school students, Mishna, Khoury-Kassabri, Gadalla and Daciuk (2012) explored the factors that contribute to engagement with cyberbullying, looking at groups of actors including victims, bullies, bully-victims (both bully and be bullied online) and those not involved.…”
Section: A Typology Of Cyberbullying Actorsmentioning
confidence: 99%