2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.106850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing different multiple flow algorithms to calculate RUSLE factors of slope length (L) and slope steepness (S) in Switzerland

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Length and slope (LS-factor) are fundamental for estimating soil erosion rates and the sediment transport capacity (Renard et al, 1997). In RULSE, LS calculation takes into account the upward area contribution and a rillinterrill erosion ratio (Bircher;Liniger;Prasuhn, 2019). The methodology applied in this study was initially based on Pelton, Frazier and Pickilingis (2012) proposal, with the support of Algebra map, which allows the application of the equation developed by Mitasova et al (1996) (Equation 4).…”
Section: A = R • K • Ls • Cp (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Length and slope (LS-factor) are fundamental for estimating soil erosion rates and the sediment transport capacity (Renard et al, 1997). In RULSE, LS calculation takes into account the upward area contribution and a rillinterrill erosion ratio (Bircher;Liniger;Prasuhn, 2019). The methodology applied in this study was initially based on Pelton, Frazier and Pickilingis (2012) proposal, with the support of Algebra map, which allows the application of the equation developed by Mitasova et al (1996) (Equation 4).…”
Section: A = R • K • Ls • Cp (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its empirical structure, in its revised version (RUSLE), several applications have been generated at watersheds with restrict database for calibration and validation of the process-based models, using an interface with GIS (Tang et al, 2015). Recent studies have been carried out in different countries and basins using RUSLE, such as Italy (Terranova et al, 2009), Brazil (Beskow et al, 2009), Vietnam (Ranzi;Le;Rulli, 2012), Spain (Fernández;Vega, 2018), Ethiopia (Zerihun et al, 2018), Switzerland (Bircher;Liniger;Prasuhn, 2019), China (Teng et al, 2018), India (Pal;Chakrabortty, 2019), among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the resolution of DEM data has influenced the accuracy of LS value, especially in the complex terrain regions [62,63]. The flow direction algorithm is also an effective tool in determining the LS value [64,65]. Given the necessity of these determining factors, we can conclude that the LS is a sensitive aspect of soil loss prediction by the USLE model [66].…”
Section: Erodibility Factor (K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation has been removed in the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) by taking into consideration the rainfall energy [15]. Recent research, integrating RUSLE in the Geographic Information System (GIS) and remote sensing techniques, aided by the ever-increasing power and efficiency of computers [26], enables estimating soil loss for large areas quickly and at a reasonable cost [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] in different climatic zones [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%