1998
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.19.2136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Different Routes and Doses of Phytonadione for Reversing Excessive Anticoagulation

Abstract: Background: Significant controversy exists concerning how best to reverse excessive anticoagulation (due to warfarin sodium therapy) with phytonadione (vitamin K 1 ) while avoiding overcorrection in patients who need to have anticoagulation therapy maintained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
57
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response to subcutaneous vitamin K 1 is unpredictable and sometimes delayed. 161,162 In contrast, oral administration is predictably effective and has the advantages of convenience and safety over parenteral routes. In patients with excessively prolonged INR values, vitamin K 1 , 1 mg to 2.5 mg orally, more rapidly lowers the INR to Ͻ5 within 24 hours than simply withholding warfarin.…”
Section: Management Of Patients With High Inr Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response to subcutaneous vitamin K 1 is unpredictable and sometimes delayed. 161,162 In contrast, oral administration is predictably effective and has the advantages of convenience and safety over parenteral routes. In patients with excessively prolonged INR values, vitamin K 1 , 1 mg to 2.5 mg orally, more rapidly lowers the INR to Ͻ5 within 24 hours than simply withholding warfarin.…”
Section: Management Of Patients With High Inr Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jury is not out on which route of administration is best. Whitling et al evaluated four different routes of vitamin K administration for reversing excessive anticoagulation: high-dose intravenous (1-10 mg), low-dose intravenous (≤0.5 mg), subcutaneous (1-10 mg), and oral (2.5-5 mg) [71]. Anticoagulation was achieved in all four groups.…”
Section: Management: Systemic Interventions (Table 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these 21 studies, 13 were excluded for the following reasons: inclusion of patients with therapeutic INR values, 9 warfarin therapy not suspended, 9,10 vitamin K use in doses greater than 2.5 mg, 11 use of anticoagulants other than warfarin, [12][13][14] published before the development of the INR system, 15 no INR measurement 24 hours following treatment 16 and lack of prospective data collection. [17][18][19][20] One review paper 21 was also excluded because it lacked original data. Eight studies, [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] with a total of 344 patients, met all of the inclusion criteria and were included in this review (Tables 2 and 3).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%