2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl081129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Electron Energetics and UV Brightness in Jupiter's Northern Polar Region During Juno Perijove 5

Abstract: We compare electron and UV observations mapping to the same location in Jupiter's northern polar region, poleward of the main aurora, during Juno perijove 5. Simultaneous peaks in UV brightness and electron energy flux are identified when observations map to the same location at the same time. The downward energy flux during these simultaneous observations was not sufficient to generate the observed UV brightness; the upward energy flux was. We propose that the primary acceleration region is below Juno's altit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
7
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PJ3‐N, PJ10‐N, and PJ11‐N show examples of electron flux‐auroral brightness structures where the peak of the JEDI energy flux is comparable to the corresponding UV flux but is significantly narrower and drops by more than an order of magnitude faster than the corresponding H 2 ‐derived energy flux. In contrast, the PJ5‐N ME crossing shows no excess H 2 auroral emission, in agreement with the comparison with the JADE measurements by Ebert et al (). PJ7‐S shows some excess JEDI flux at 2:34 when crossing the field lines threading the ME.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…PJ3‐N, PJ10‐N, and PJ11‐N show examples of electron flux‐auroral brightness structures where the peak of the JEDI energy flux is comparable to the corresponding UV flux but is significantly narrower and drops by more than an order of magnitude faster than the corresponding H 2 ‐derived energy flux. In contrast, the PJ5‐N ME crossing shows no excess H 2 auroral emission, in agreement with the comparison with the JADE measurements by Ebert et al (). PJ7‐S shows some excess JEDI flux at 2:34 when crossing the field lines threading the ME.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Finally, note that other studies by Ebert et al (2019) and Gérard et al (2019) find times when the energy flux is correlated with the UV brightness at the magnetic foot point of Juno and also other times when it does not, probably for similar reasons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…JEDI is a complement to the lower energy Jupiter Auroral Distributions Experiment (JADE) instrument, which measures distributions of electrons from 100 eV to 100 keV, and of ions with composition up to 46 keV/q, where q is electric charge (McComas et al, 2017). Some initial results from the JADE instrument over auroral regions and the polar caps are provided by Allegrini et al (2017), Ebert et al (2017Ebert et al ( , 2019, and Szalay et al (2017). Of special importance to our investigation here is the magnetometer measurements (Connerney, Benn, et al, 2017), which allow particle measurements to be ordered by pitch angle (angle between the particle velocity vector and the magnetic field vector).…”
Section: Juno Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%