2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing encapsulation-dehydration and droplet-vitrification for cryopreservation of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) shoot tips

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The availability of an efficient and reliable cryogenic protocol yielding a high recovery percentage is a prerequisite for large scale, routine application of cryopreservation [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The availability of an efficient and reliable cryogenic protocol yielding a high recovery percentage is a prerequisite for large scale, routine application of cryopreservation [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these experiments, the average recovery ranged from 47% to 85%. This vitrification protocol was improved by incorporating a two-step dehydration procedure and successfully applied to ten Vitis cultivars or species, with shoot recovery ranging between 60% and 80% [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encapsulation-dehydration experiments were performed as described by Barraco et al (2011) with the following modifications. Shoot tips were excised and then dipped into 100 or 150 mg L -1 ascorbic acid for 1 h. They were then placed in a solution of 60 g L -1 sucrose + MS for 24 h and encapsulated into calcium-alginate beads.…”
Section: Encapsulation-dehydrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, in vitro shoot tips of two clones were successfully cryopreserved using encapsulation-dehydration according to Gonzalez-Arnao et al, (1993) and dropletvitrification with two vitrification solutions, PVS2 and PVS3 (Barraco et al, 2011). For both clones, encapsulation-dehydration induced significantly higher recovery, reaching 60% for clone H70-144 and 53% for clone CP68-1026, compared with droplet-vitrification in which recovery was 33-37% for clone H70-144 and 20-27% for clone CP68-1026.…”
Section: Apicesmentioning
confidence: 99%