2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2011.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing equivalent thermal, high pressure and pulsed electric field processes for mild pasteurization of orange juice. Part I: Impact on overall quality attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
91
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
16
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, mild heat pasteurization over the range of 70 to 72°C have begun to be applied in many studies to ensure high quality in several types of fruit juices (Timmermans et al, 2011). The FDA has also recommended a minimum temperature (71.1°C) and time (3 s) for pasteurization of food products over the pH range of 3.6 and 4.0 (FDA, 2004).…”
Section: Inactivation Of E Coli K12 With Heat Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, mild heat pasteurization over the range of 70 to 72°C have begun to be applied in many studies to ensure high quality in several types of fruit juices (Timmermans et al, 2011). The FDA has also recommended a minimum temperature (71.1°C) and time (3 s) for pasteurization of food products over the pH range of 3.6 and 4.0 (FDA, 2004).…”
Section: Inactivation Of E Coli K12 With Heat Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim in this study was to evaluate if processing, either by moderate intensity PEF and long pulse duration or thermal treatment, changes these values compared to untreated juice. For both juices A and B, the values for soluble solids of PEF treated and thermal treated juice were not different from untreated juice, being 11.1 ± 0.1 °Brix for juices A and 11.6 ± 0.1 °Brix for juices B, which can be considered as a normal value (Bull et al, 2004;Hartyáni et al, 2011;Nagy & Smoot, 1977;Timmermans et al, 2011). Also the pH value for juice A and B did not change by thermal or PEF treatment, and values for juices A and B were pH = 3.51 ± 0.01 and pH = 2.99 ± 0.02, respectively.…”
Section: Ph and Soluble Solidsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…High intensity PEF processing of citrus juices at moderate temperatures (T < 60 °C), showed only a minimal impact on the physicochemical quality properties (pH, soluble solids, electric conductivity, colour, viscosity), nutritional values (vitamin C content, carotenoids) and the sensorial quality when compared to untreated juice (Cserhalmi et al, 2006;Hartyáni et al, 2011;Timmermans et al, 2011;Vervoort et al, 2011).…”
Section: Effect Of Pef On Quality Attributes and Shelf Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations