2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22723-8_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Fatigue When Using Large Horizontal and Vertical Multi-touch Interaction Displays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contrast is even more surprising as our size difference is much larger (27" against 69.5") than that of Anslow/Wong (27" against 40"). So we assume that the difference hinges on their specific scenario but we conclude that a larger display has no general disadvantages in terms of performance but certainly in terms of fatigue [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This contrast is even more surprising as our size difference is much larger (27" against 69.5") than that of Anslow/Wong (27" against 40"). So we assume that the difference hinges on their specific scenario but we conclude that a larger display has no general disadvantages in terms of performance but certainly in terms of fatigue [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, it is significantly slower compared with the small display (13.5"). Also, it is well known that touch interactions on large displays cause fatigue [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22] comparing vertical and horizontal multi-touch displays found that the horizontal surface encouraged more equal physical interactions among participants with the shared display, as well as equal verbal participation, which differs from Rogers and Lindley's study. Al-Megren et al also showed that the vertical configuration was more likely to cause muscle fatigue comparing to the horizontal configuration [2].…”
Section: The Impact Of Device Form Factors On Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, vertical surfaces seem better suited to cooperative situations in which one person drives an activity and distributes tasks to others. Therefore, we suggest choosing a horizontal surface for activities that require equal participation, such as collaborative learning where participants have to acquire the same skills and knowledge [2]. We suggest using a vertical surface for the activities where one person takes control.…”
Section: Implications For Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…out arm support, in particular, leads to the so-called "gorillaarm" effect [1,11]. Swiping or throwing objects over large distances raises precision problems [4,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%