2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing flexible and conventional monolithic building design: Life cycle environmental impact and potential for material circulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to highlight that a majority of the articles did not conduct a complete LCA. Some studies consider only the cradle-to-gate system [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], while others address the cradle-to-grave approach [28,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. In contrast, few studies have assessed more than one life cycle [56][57][58][59], existing urban stocks renewals [60], reuse scenarios [61][62][63], and credits for potential reuse, energy recovery, or recycling of materials in subsequent product systems [64].…”
Section: Built Environment Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to highlight that a majority of the articles did not conduct a complete LCA. Some studies consider only the cradle-to-gate system [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46], while others address the cradle-to-grave approach [28,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. In contrast, few studies have assessed more than one life cycle [56][57][58][59], existing urban stocks renewals [60], reuse scenarios [61][62][63], and credits for potential reuse, energy recovery, or recycling of materials in subsequent product systems [64].…”
Section: Built Environment Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disseminated use of LCA is because it offers a systematic approach to quantifying environmental impacts. In addition, other studies used the LCA to help in the process of comparing environmental aspects and potential impact associated with materials options [41][42][43][45][46][47]51,54,56,61], building types [65], and modular building with strategies for the end-of-life (disassembly and reuse strategies) [66].…”
Section: Built Environment Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durability and possibility to repair or replace the damaged parts [19], [20], [26] 8. Facilitating the adaption to increased loads [19], [26] The abovementioned strategies for wood as a circular structural material can be seen as design for disassembly (1,2,4,5,6), design for robustness (8), design for durability (3,5,7), or design for repairability (3,7). Although design experts rate design for deconstruction/disassembly as one of the least effective enablers for adaptability [2, p. 426] [24, p. 25], it is mentioned most in timber literature.…”
Section: Timber Engineering On Circularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction industry is a major source of air pollution. Studies suggest that construction of buildings and their maintenance is responsible for as much as 30% of global production of greenhouse gasses [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%