2020
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing focal plane wavefront control techniques: Numerical simulations and laboratory experiments

Abstract: Context. Fewer than 1% of all exoplanets detected to date have been characterized on the basis of spectroscopic observations of their atmosphere. Unlike indirect methods, high-contrast imaging offers access to atmospheric signatures by separating the light of a faint off-axis source from that of its parent star. Forthcoming space facilities, such as WFIRST/LUVOIR/HabEX, are expected to use coronagraphic instruments capable of imaging and spectroscopy in order to understand the physical properties of remote wor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 still holds for all the pixels in the DH where we seek to minimize the speckle intensity. We demonstrate in Potier et al (2020) that pushing and pulling two neighbor actuators allows us to estimate properly the electric field in almost the entire field of view. We therefore decided to use two actuator pokes as probes, aligned in the vertical direction and located on the HODM just below the Lyot stop obstruction shadow.…”
Section: Pair-wise Probingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…12 still holds for all the pixels in the DH where we seek to minimize the speckle intensity. We demonstrate in Potier et al (2020) that pushing and pulling two neighbor actuators allows us to estimate properly the electric field in almost the entire field of view. We therefore decided to use two actuator pokes as probes, aligned in the vertical direction and located on the HODM just below the Lyot stop obstruction shadow.…”
Section: Pair-wise Probingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…That means that any error in the optical model will fold into a wrong reconstruction and control, which will limit the achieved contrast. 25 However, both equations can also be combined into a single linear problem! ∆I = 4M T Gα = F α.…”
Section: Focal Plane Wavefront Control With Magao-xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 the inverse of the minimum eigenvalue of M for each IRDIS pixel. As seen in Potier et al (2020), this map displays the regions in which M is invertible. In Fig.…”
Section: Pair-wise Probingmentioning
confidence: 99%