2001
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2001.tb00034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing in‐work benefits and the reward to work for families with children in the US and the UK

Abstract: The income transfer systems for low‐income families in the US and the UK try both to reduce poverty and to encourage work. In‐work benefits are a key part of both countries' strategies through the earned income tax credit and the working families' tax credit (and predecessors) respectively. But tax credits are only one part of the whole tax and welfare system. In‐work benefits, taxes and welfare benefits combine in both countries to provide good financial incentives for lone parents to do minimum‐wage work, bu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is, of course, no reason to expect similar behavioural responses to different in-work benefits from two different groups in different labour markets; one very important difference between WFTC and EITC is that per-family expenditure on WFTC is around four times as high as it is for EITC: see Fig. 10 of Brewer (2001).…”
Section: Evaluations Of Other In-work Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There is, of course, no reason to expect similar behavioural responses to different in-work benefits from two different groups in different labour markets; one very important difference between WFTC and EITC is that per-family expenditure on WFTC is around four times as high as it is for EITC: see Fig. 10 of Brewer (2001).…”
Section: Evaluations Of Other In-work Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…An interesting feature of the U.K. reforms has been the changing incentive structure toward part-time and full-time work engendered by these reforms. Not only has employment responded to these reforms but so has the distribution of weekly hours of work (Blundell et al 2000;Brewer 2001). However, the mechanism for these adjustments in labor supply has not been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this UK tax credit system implies that care of dependent children is not compatible with full-time work. Instead the norm for mothers of dependent children in the UK is to work part-time and take the primary role as an active parent [3,6,9].…”
Section: Social and Occupational Welfare Provision: Alternatives In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, lone mothers particularly are given an incentive to look for employment over 16 hours, since the priority of the C&WTC is getting one person from each workless household into employment, rather than facilitating women's employment participation more generally [9,65].…”
Section: Social and Occupational Welfare Provision: Alternatives In Tmentioning
confidence: 99%