2017
DOI: 10.14257/ijel.2017.6.1.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Learning Speed of new Mazes in Rats with and without Prior Maze Learning Experience

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A range of transfer outcomes have been observed, ranging from positive transfer (improvement in performance) to neutral effect (no change) to negative transfer (worsening) (Webb, 1917;Wiltbank, 1919;Dennis et al, 1932). Further, transfer was reported for different degrees of experience: rats performed fewer errors when learning a new maze even with partial training of a different maze (Ho, 1928;Bunch and Lang, 1939) or after training in multiple mazes (Dashiell, 1920;Rashid et al, 2017). Further, solving new problems can also improve when rats had dissimilar past experience, such as prior operant learning improving new spatial learning (Adams, 2003) or positive transfer between mazes with different rules (Gallup and Diamond, 1960).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A range of transfer outcomes have been observed, ranging from positive transfer (improvement in performance) to neutral effect (no change) to negative transfer (worsening) (Webb, 1917;Wiltbank, 1919;Dennis et al, 1932). Further, transfer was reported for different degrees of experience: rats performed fewer errors when learning a new maze even with partial training of a different maze (Ho, 1928;Bunch and Lang, 1939) or after training in multiple mazes (Dashiell, 1920;Rashid et al, 2017). Further, solving new problems can also improve when rats had dissimilar past experience, such as prior operant learning improving new spatial learning (Adams, 2003) or positive transfer between mazes with different rules (Gallup and Diamond, 1960).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%