2017
DOI: 10.1080/17480930.2017.1386430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing linear and non-linear kriging for grade prediction and ore/waste classification in mineral deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, Daya and Bejari [50] compared the performance of two kriging techniques, simple kriging and ordinary kriging, in copper deposits and found that while simple kriging produced a smoother result, the result obtained from ordinary kriging was more accurate. Studies by Hekmatnejad et al [53] showed that ordinary kriging also compares well with non-linear kriging techniques (e.g., disjunctive kriging). However, in some instances, disjunctive kriging may outperform ordinary kriging [53].…”
Section: Krigingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, Daya and Bejari [50] compared the performance of two kriging techniques, simple kriging and ordinary kriging, in copper deposits and found that while simple kriging produced a smoother result, the result obtained from ordinary kriging was more accurate. Studies by Hekmatnejad et al [53] showed that ordinary kriging also compares well with non-linear kriging techniques (e.g., disjunctive kriging). However, in some instances, disjunctive kriging may outperform ordinary kriging [53].…”
Section: Krigingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies by Hekmatnejad et al [53] showed that ordinary kriging also compares well with non-linear kriging techniques (e.g., disjunctive kriging). However, in some instances, disjunctive kriging may outperform ordinary kriging [53]. Other advanced kriging techniques, such as fuzzy kriging and compositional kriging, have also shown reliable results.…”
Section: Krigingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12][13][14]. These problems can be solved on the basis of a set of studies aimed at geometrization, statistical evaluation of the deposit, and modeling and monitoring of its shape, properties and volumes [15][16][17][18][19]. Geometry and subsoil modeling [20][21][22][23] is based on information about geological, geochemical, geomechanical and other properties of the deposit that characterize various features and indicators (structure, properties, state) of the mountain massif and sources of georesources [24][25][26][27], which are modeled geometrically, including topographic surfaces and different types of projections [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the support effect is a major issue in mineral resources modeling that occurs when the desirable volume for the final analysis is not equal to the initial volume of the sampling data. Geostatistical techniques such as nonlinear kriging [10,11] and direct block simulation (DBS) [12][13][14] were introduced to assess whether or not the average grade at the block support exceeds a cut-off grade and to classify the block as ore or waste, without the need to create a fine grid and to average the grade values predicted or simulated at the points of this grid [15,16]. This considerably reduces CPU time and memory requirements and make these techniques attractive for modeling large-scale deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%