Comparing local politicians’ and bureaucrats’ assessments of democratic participation: the cases of Norway and Sweden

Abstract

Given the increasing emphasis on delivery and output as a source of legitimacy for local government, how do politicians and civil servants perceive conventional, input-based channels for citizens’ influence on government in relationship to performance and output-oriented opportunities to influence public service? This article compares the attitudes of senior local politicians and civil servants in Norwegian and Swedish local authorities on these issues. The analysis draws on a data set collected among political and administrative leaders in Norwegian and Swedish local authorities. We also compare a service sector where public management reform has been extensive (care of the elderly) with a service sector where regulation and law enforcement dominates (planning and construction). The analysis suggests that there is a significant similarity between politicians’ and bureaucrats’ attitudes, although politicians accord greater importance to input-based channels of influence and to throughput than do bureaucrats. Points for practitioners Public management reform provides a new channel for clients to influence public service directly through the providers of those services and not through conventional political channels. This article studies how politicians and public servants in Norwegian and Swedish municipalities evaluate conventional and new channels for clients to influence service delivery. We also compare service sectors where such choice is extensive with areas where choice is much more constrained. Overall, we find that politicians tend to favor conventional political channels for clients’ influence whereas public servants take a more positive view of clients approaching the executive side of the local authority.

‘Keeping politicians at arm’s length’: how managers in a collaborative organization deal with the administration–politics interface

“…In other words, the nature of the manager-politician interface varies depending on the issue at hand (Alford et al, 2017: 753). Something else said to affect the relationship between the roles is reform (Cloutier et al, 2015;Pierre et al, 2017). For instance, in NPM models -intended to 'depoliticize' administration -politicians see themselves as 'members of a corporate board' giving direction to administration once a year, leading to increased distance between the two roles (Torfing and Ansell, 2017: 41).…”

The unique role of municipalities in integrated watershed governance arrangements: a new research frontier

“…In this way, continuity is maintained at the day-to-day administrative level, whereas mid-to long-term project planning may be subject to new perspectives and policy https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol24/iss1/art28/ proscriptions. However, recent research also suggests there may be differences between the objectives of elected officials and career bureaucrats at the municipal level, which should be considered in future research (Pierre et al 2017). Additionally, many municipalities in Sweden are experiencing problems not so much because of political dynamics, but in recruiting and keeping competent civil servants.…”

Exit and Voice in Local Government Reconsidered: A ‘Choice Revolution’?

“…Since the informants in this survey consist of both politicians and bureaucrats, and since there are reasons to expect the two groups to have different perceptions of citizens' participation (see e.g. Peters 2010; Pierre et al 2015), we furthermore introduce a dummy variable expressing whether the informant is an appointed bureaucrat or an elected politician. Finally, we introduce a set of variables referring to sex, age and education.…”