2013
DOI: 10.5296/ajfa.v5i1.2977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Logit, Probit and Multiple Discriminant Analysis Models in Predicting Bankruptcy of Companies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More importantly, their relative values indicate their relative influence on the binary variable (Roncek, ). The final, and clearest, reason to apply logit methodology to our propensity score‐matched samples is provided by Khalili Araghi, and Makvandi (): Using the same sample, the authors compare the accuracy of logit, probit, and MDA models and give evidence for the superiority of the first when predicting bankruptcies. All in all, the combination of propensity score matching and logit methodology ensures that the results are not biased by self‐selection, as described by Heckman (), and therefore increases their accuracy and verifiability compared to solely matching on industry and size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, their relative values indicate their relative influence on the binary variable (Roncek, ). The final, and clearest, reason to apply logit methodology to our propensity score‐matched samples is provided by Khalili Araghi, and Makvandi (): Using the same sample, the authors compare the accuracy of logit, probit, and MDA models and give evidence for the superiority of the first when predicting bankruptcies. All in all, the combination of propensity score matching and logit methodology ensures that the results are not biased by self‐selection, as described by Heckman (), and therefore increases their accuracy and verifiability compared to solely matching on industry and size.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He found that the proposed DEA approach achieved comparable classification accuracy to traditional techniques (DA and LR). Araghi and Makvandi (2013) used not only conventional DEA but also inverse DEA as predictors in LR. They quantified 72% overall accuracy of DEA, which is less compared to LR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Credit scoring modeling can be built through various methods, including Logistic Regression (RS), Discriminant Analysis, The k-nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Bootstrap Aggregation, Boosting, Random Forest (RF), The Support Vector Machine (SVM), An artificial neural network, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), and Variable Neighborhood Search (VNS) Although Logistic Regression is the most popular method in credit scoring modeling and is specifically developed when the output variable is binary (Lessmann et al, 2015), with the consideration that this method can produce a cut-off point value that can become a threshold (Araghi & Maryam, 2013;Mihalovič, 2016). This threshold value becomes the basis for consideration in assessing the feasibility of corporate credit.…”
Section: Figure 1 Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logistic regression is a predictive modeling approach used to study the relationship of one or more independent variables with one dependent variable on a dichotomous (binary) scale, which is a nominal data scale with two categories. Logistic regression emphasizes finding linear combinations of two or more predictors that are able to predict among groups of companies that are eligible or ineligible for corporate credit at banks (Araghi & Maryam, 2013;Hosmer et al, 2013) through the assessment of the company's credit rating published by the Indonesian Securities Rating Agency, which is worth one if the corporate credit application is eligible and worth 0 if the corporate credit application is not eligible. The companies included in the 1-value criteria are companies with credit ratings of AAA to B, while companies included in the 0 criteria are companies with credit ratings lower than B to unrated companies (Hu & Su, 2022).…”
Section: Figure 1 Research Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%