Background:
We sought to identify and explore the utility of biofeedback assessments used to characterize pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) in terms of contraction, relaxation, and resting tone and determine if these methods have identified differences between males diagnosed with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) as opposed to healthy controls.
Methods:
A search strategy was developed with the assistance of a health sciences librarian. Search terms were generated related to key concepts including sex, CPP, and biofeedback. Five electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, and PEDro) were searched for English language articles. This scoping review was completed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, and the protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework.
Results:
Five eligible studies comparing males with CPP to nonpainful controls were identified. Ultrasound imaging, surface electromyography, and anorectal manometry were used in the studies. Identification of increased pelvic floor muscle resting tone and reduced endurance were noted as the most salient pelvic floor muscle findings.
Discussion:
Biofeedback use included males with urologic chronic pelvic pain and chronic anorectal pain. PFMs may behave differently in males with CPP compared to nonpainful controls as measured using biofeedback methods including ultrasound imaging, surface electromyography, and anorectal manometry; however, further research is needed to verify the conclusions of the studies done to date. Biofeedback assessment measures can be useful when PFMs are involved in CPP to identify specific muscle dysfunction and clarify treatment targets for physiotherapists.