Comparing mechanical properties of composites structures on Onyx base with different density and shape of fill

Bárnik, František; Vaško, Milan; Handrik, Marián; Dorčiak, Filip; Majko, Jaroslav

doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.088

Cited by 31 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Its principle is the same as that of FDM. It can print and add carbon fiber and other reinforced material wires, which directly enhances the performance of printing products [ 67 , 68 , 69 ].…”

Section: 3d Printing Of Conductive Carbon Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Conductive Carbon Materials for 3D Printing: Materials, Technologies, Properties, and Applications

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon material is widely used and has good electrical and thermal conductivity. It is often used as a filler to endow insulating polymer with electrical and thermal conductivity. Three-dimensional printing technology is an advance in modeling and manufacturing technology. From the forming principle, it offers a new production principle of layered manufacturing and layer by layer stacking formation, which fundamentally simplifies the production process and makes large-scale personalized production possible. Conductive carbon materials combined with 3D printing technology have a variety of potential applications, such as multi-shape sensors, wearable devices, supercapacitors, and so on. In this review, carbon black, carbon nanotubes, carbon fiber, graphene, and other common conductive carbon materials are briefly introduced. The working principle, advantages and disadvantages of common 3D printing technology are reviewed. The research situation of 3D printable conductive carbon materials in recent years is further summarized, and the performance characteristics and application prospects of these conductive carbon materials are also discussed. Finally, the potential applications of 3D printable conductive carbon materials are concluded, and the future development direction of 3D printable conductive carbon materials has also been prospected.

show abstract

Section: 3d Printing Of Conductive Carbon Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Review of Conductive Carbon Materials for 3D Printing: Materials, Technologies, Properties, and Applications

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Overview of fabrication methods documented in the literature, with citations to specific references, showing a setup schematic, compatible filler material alignment methods, size of printed specimens, minimum feature resolution, print speed and material limitations. Electric field [8,24,34,38,53,56,57,[108][109][110] Magnetic field [25,39,52,54,59,[111][112][113][114] Ultrasound wave field [33,49,60] Mechanical [64,65,[67][68][69]79,80,[83][84][85][86][87]107, Shear force field [63,66,[70][71][72][73][74][136][137][138][139][140][141]…”

Section: Operating Envelope Limitations and Applications Of Combinementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hundreds of millimeters [68] (10 [80] -310 [68] mm) Tens of millimeters [94] (8 [94] -57.5 [95] mm) Tens of millimeters [21] (2 [101] -22 [21] mm) Feature resolution 500 μm [60] -7 mm [25] specimen thickness 100 [79] -200 μm [140] layer thickness 200 [94] -500 μm [91] line width 90 μm [102] -1 mm [101] layer thickness Print speed N/A 1.7 [85] -280 mm s À1 [79] 1-20 mm s À1 [93] Projector SLA: 2 [26] -18 [103] s curing/layer Laser SLA: 20 mm s À1 plus filler material alignment time [101]…”

Section: Operating Envelope Limitations and Applications Of Combinementioning

confidence: 99%

Additive Manufacturing of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials with Aligned or Organized Filler Material: A Review

Niendorf

Raeymaekers

2021

Adv Eng Mater

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ability to fabricate polymer matrix composite materials with continuous or discontinuous filler material, oriented in a user-specified direction, enables implementing designer material properties, such as anisotropic mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. Conventional fabrication methods rely on a mold, which limits specimen geometry and is difficult to implement. In contrast, additive manufacturing, including fused filament fabrication or fused deposition modeling, direct ink writing, or stereolithography, combined with a method to align filler material such as a mechanical force or an electric, magnetic, shear force, or ultrasound wave field, enables 3D printing polymer matrix composite material specimens with complex geometry and aligned filler material, without the need for a mold. Herein, we review the combinations of fabrication and filler material alignment methods used to fabricate polymer matrix composite materials, in terms of operating and design parameters including size, resolution, print speed, filler material alignment time, polymer matrix and filler material requirements, and filler manipulation requirements. The operating envelope of each fabrication method is described and their advantages, disadvantages, and limitations are discussed. Finally, different combinations of 3D printing and filler material alignment methods in the context of important engineering applications, such as structural materials, flexible electronics, and shape-changing materials, are illustrated.

show abstract

“…These materials have properties such as a very good reproducibility, a higher strength-weight ratio, low specific mass, absence of corrosion, resistance to shock, traction and fatigue, low coefficient of thermal dilatation, chemical stability, abrasion resistance, high durability and reliability [2]. It is on account of these properties that such materials are favored over classical ones in many engineering applications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tensile Properties of 3D-printed Continuous-Fiber-Reinforced Plastics

Cofaru¹,

Pascu²,

Oleksik³

et al. 2022

Mater. Plast.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Obtaining parts made of composite materials through 3D Printing Additive manufacturing have fully proved their usefulness due to a number of advantages such as: the possibility to directly create complex shapes without going through the classic process of transforming the semi-finished products into finished parts through technologies which consume resources and energy and are totally unfriendly to the environment. The main disadvantage of the parts made by 3D Printing technologies is that they are less resistant from a mechanical point of view. This was solved with the emergence of the 3D printers capable of printing composite parts consisting of a plastic matrix reinforced with continuous fibers. This research focuses on studying 4 types of composite materials from the point of view of their mechanical properties: Onyx - a rigid nylon in which micro carbon fibers are inserted and Onyx reinforced with carbon, fiber glass or kevlar. Standardized specimens were made for the uniaxial tensile test and the experimental program was designed evaluating: the Elastic modulus [GPa], the Maximum Tensile stress [MPa], the Tensile strain at maximum Tensile stress [mm/mm]. The principal strains were also determined, by means of the digital image technique made using the Aramis system from GOM. The experimental tests confirm that these new materials will be serious candidates to be used in the engineering applications in various fields.

show abstract

Comparing mechanical properties of composites structures on Onyx base with different density and shape of fill

Cited by 31 publications

References 5 publications

A Review of Conductive Carbon Materials for 3D Printing: Materials, Technologies, Properties, and Applications

A Review of Conductive Carbon Materials for 3D Printing: Materials, Technologies, Properties, and Applications

Additive Manufacturing of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials with Aligned or Organized Filler Material: A Review

Tensile Properties of 3D-printed Continuous-Fiber-Reinforced Plastics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About