2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2015.02.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing membrane- and cantilever-based surface stress sensors for reproducibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also worth noting that the sensing signal of an MSS structure is robust against such fluctuation in surface stress compared to a cantilever-type structure. 22 The results shown in Figs. 9 and 10 are favorable from the view point of analysis of cell motility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is also worth noting that the sensing signal of an MSS structure is robust against such fluctuation in surface stress compared to a cantilever-type structure. 22 The results shown in Figs. 9 and 10 are favorable from the view point of analysis of cell motility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast, a compact measurement system can be realized with an MSS because of the chip-integrated piezoresistive electric sensing. Furthermore, MSS exhibits higher robustness to the adsorption position and in homogeneous coating (Loizeau et al, 2015 ). Thus, MSS seems to be a more favorable option for practical applications such as mobile environmental monitoring systems, point-of-care-testing (POCT) and primary screening for infectious diseases, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations into the performance of cantilever based sensors has reiterated the importance of the functionalisation method by comparing cantilever sensors with membrane-type surface stress sensors [16]. Cantilever sensor technology has also recently been applied in the detection of a veterinary drug kanamycin using aptamer-based cantilever array sensors [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%