2022
DOI: 10.1121/10.0011401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing methodologies for classification of zebra finch distance calls

Abstract: Bioacoustic analysis has been used for a variety of purposes including classifying vocalizations for biodiversity monitoring and understanding mechanisms of cognitive processes. A wide range of statistical methods, including various automated methods, have been used to successfully classify vocalizations based on species, sex, geography, and individual. A comprehensive approach focusing on identifying acoustic features putatively involved in classification is required for the prediction of features necessary f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 86 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has become the standard approach for bioacoustic analysis and it is still routinely used nowadays despite its limitations (e.g. [ 18 , 19 ] in chimpanzees; [ 20 ] in Dwarf mongoose; [ 21 ] in woodpeckers, among recent publications; see also [ 22 ] in zebra finch for a comparison with two other classifiers). Being derived from classical DFA, it indeed shares its main shortcomings: it is quite sensitive to the presence of outliers in the dataset and the maximal number of features as well as the number of observations that can be considered are quite constrained by the dataset structure and the dependency among the observations (see [ 17 ] for a thorough discussion).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become the standard approach for bioacoustic analysis and it is still routinely used nowadays despite its limitations (e.g. [ 18 , 19 ] in chimpanzees; [ 20 ] in Dwarf mongoose; [ 21 ] in woodpeckers, among recent publications; see also [ 22 ] in zebra finch for a comparison with two other classifiers). Being derived from classical DFA, it indeed shares its main shortcomings: it is quite sensitive to the presence of outliers in the dataset and the maximal number of features as well as the number of observations that can be considered are quite constrained by the dataset structure and the dependency among the observations (see [ 17 ] for a thorough discussion).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%