2017
DOI: 10.1093/police/pax049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Methods for Measuring Crime Harm/Severity

Abstract: Ensuring police resources are focused where they are most needed requires understanding of the consequences of crime in relation to offenders, victims and places. Most crime analysis is based on counts of crimes, but not all crimes are equivalent to one another. Researchers have recently developed two methods-the Crime Harm Index and the Crime Severity Score-for weighting crime counts according to the severity of different crime types. This article compares these two methods by applying them to two common crim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The type of crime is directly relevant because each crime type is associated with sentencing guidelines for judges in the CCC and suggested sentence length increases with crime severity (CCC, 1985). The type of crime and associated sentencing guidelines are commonly used as a proxy for measuring the harm caused by different types of crime and the associated impact felt by the victim (see Ashby, 2018; Sherman et al, 2016).…”
Section: Factors Related To Vissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of crime is directly relevant because each crime type is associated with sentencing guidelines for judges in the CCC and suggested sentence length increases with crime severity (CCC, 1985). The type of crime and associated sentencing guidelines are commonly used as a proxy for measuring the harm caused by different types of crime and the associated impact felt by the victim (see Ashby, 2018; Sherman et al, 2016).…”
Section: Factors Related To Vissmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, Van Ruitenburg and Ruiter (2023) also pointed out methodological and implementation challenges. Indeed, a sentencing index cannot account for the varying “harm” experienced by a victim or the wider community, as the index observes the level of harm committed against the state (Paoli et al ., 2013; Linehan, 2016; Ashby, 2018; Šimon and Jíchová, 2020). Moreover, the crime harm index fails to account for non-crime incidents, antisocial behaviour and physical disorder, which are not always recordable (or recorded) crimes but are also known to have an effect on the community where they occur (Ariel et al.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the CHI and the ONS's CSS have strengths and weaknesses (Ashby 2018). In the analyses presented in this report we utilise the ONS CSS, primarily because it is recorded in Cumbria Constabulary's recording system.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Victims and Offendersmentioning
confidence: 99%