2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10404-017-1865-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing methods for the modelling of boundary-driven streaming in acoustofluidic devices

Abstract: presented in this paper. Comparisons of these two numerical methods can provide effective guidance for researchers in the field of acoustofluidics on choosing appropriate methods to predict boundary-driven streaming fields in the design of acoustofluidic particle manipulation devices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation of these phenomena relies on numerically well-characterized acoustic fields, which, we believe, are provided by the model we present here. Possible model strategies to pursue in such calculations were outlined by Muller and Bruus [32], Muller et al [36] and Lei et al [59] for the case of acoustic streaming, by Silva and Bruus [60] for acoustic particle-particle interactions, and by Ley and Bruus [61] for hydrodynamic particle-particle interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation of these phenomena relies on numerically well-characterized acoustic fields, which, we believe, are provided by the model we present here. Possible model strategies to pursue in such calculations were outlined by Muller and Bruus [32], Muller et al [36] and Lei et al [59] for the case of acoustic streaming, by Silva and Bruus [60] for acoustic particle-particle interactions, and by Ley and Bruus [61] for hydrodynamic particle-particle interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most UPM devices where the dimensions of the fluid channel are much larger than the boundary layer thickness and, thus, only the outer streaming fields are usually of interest, the 2D or 3D boundary-driven streaming fields in the bulk of the fluid channel can be effectively predicted while using Nyborg's LVM. In such models, Equations (8) and (9) can be further simplified to [34]…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental governing equations of acoustic streaming generated by acoustically oscillating sources in a finite chamber have been studied extensively in the literature [50][51][52]. Here, we briefly introduce the perturbation theory and a relevant simulation process for completeness.…”
Section: Theory and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of Equation 13, respectively, by the post-processing functions of COMSOL Multiphysics, which act as the driving force of acoustic streaming field in an acoustofluidic chamber. In the last step, the steady acoustic streaming was solved by the fluidic dynamics module 'laminar flow' of COMSOL Multiphysics, and the inertial term (Stokes flow) of the fluid flow could be neglected, for the reason that the inertial force ρ 0 (u 2 •∇)u 2 was usually negligible, compared with the mass source term and the volume force term in a low-speed acoustic streaming field [52]. Equations (12) and (13) were used in the calculation of acoustic streaming, and all of the fluidic boundaries were set to be no-slip boundary conditions.…”
Section: Theory and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%