2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12306-016-0411-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing mini-open and arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint repair: functional results and return to sport

Abstract: Restoration of ACJ anatomy is the key to a successful therapy. The surgical technique should be personalized. The miny-open surgery and also the arthroscopic surgery are adequate with good clinical results. However, according to the SPORTS score, the patients treated with mini-open surgery returned to their sport with less pain and better performance than those belonging to the other group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rest all 25 patients returned to their pre-injury level of function at a mean of 6 months. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score and results in our study are similar or even better to the recent newer techniques [34,35] . Moreover surgical management of ACJ dislocation using modified Weaver-Dunn procedure does not require costly and sophisticated instruments and can be done easily in any basic surgical setup even in rural area with limited availability of resources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Rest all 25 patients returned to their pre-injury level of function at a mean of 6 months. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score and results in our study are similar or even better to the recent newer techniques [34,35] . Moreover surgical management of ACJ dislocation using modified Weaver-Dunn procedure does not require costly and sophisticated instruments and can be done easily in any basic surgical setup even in rural area with limited availability of resources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Five out of 12 studies included in the present review were also reviewed by Kay et al; however, the present review included 7 additional studies reporting on return to sport outcomes after high-grade AC dislocation, one of which was an RCT. In contrast to Kay et al, we excluded three studies [4, 11, 37] due to lack of data on the practicing of sports pre-injury and four studies due to a sample size of less than 20 athletes [1, 6, 28, 36]. Another methodological difference was the approach to non-stratified data on mixed populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean Oxford shoulder score and results in our case series are either similar or better to the recent newer techniques. 34 35 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%