2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10020119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Mixed-Media and Conventional Slow-Sand Filters for Arsenic Removal from Groundwater

Abstract: Arsenic contamination of groundwater is a major public health concern worldwide. The problem has been reported mainly in southern Asia and, especially, in Bangladesh. Slow-sand filters (SSF) augmented with iron were proven to be a simple, low-cost and decentralized technique for the treatment of arsenic-contaminated sources. In this research, three pilot-scale SSF (flowrate 6 L·h −1 ) were tested regarding their capability of removing arsenic from groundwater in conditions similar to those found in countries l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The applied upper layer of sand is capable of preventing the nails from moving while filling the filter with water. In order to facilitate cleaning of the filter, the upper sand layer was separated by a cloth from the nails [21,22]. As a consequence, it is imperative to instruct users of the filters correctly and carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applied upper layer of sand is capable of preventing the nails from moving while filling the filter with water. In order to facilitate cleaning of the filter, the upper sand layer was separated by a cloth from the nails [21,22]. As a consequence, it is imperative to instruct users of the filters correctly and carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concentration of arsenic in polluted areas is generally higher than 50 µg•L −1 , and in some areas the concentration of arsenic in water is above 1000 µg•L −1 [2][3][4][5][6]. A variety of arsenic pollution control methods have been developed, such as filtration [7,8], phytoremediation [9,10], coagulation [11][12][13], membrane [14,15], ion exchange [16,17], and adsorption [18][19][20].One of the most convenient methods to apply is adsorption [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KAF containing iron nails is such a promising solution [22,23]. However, available reports on As removal by KAFs seem rather univocal and overly generalized on their As removal efficiency [2,3,[24][25][26][27][28]. In particular, Smith et al [27] demonstrated that iron nails placed in biosand filter (BSF) were more effective than those placed above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%