2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2014.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Mycobacterium massiliense and Mycobacterium abscessus lung infections in cystic fibrosis patients

Abstract: Our data show a particular link between M. massiliense and malnutrition specifically in CF patients. Unlike M. abscessus, the bacteriological response of M. massiliense to combination antibiotic therapies containing clarithromycin was excellent. Distinguishing between M. massiliense and M. abscessus has major clinical implications for CF patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…of current antibiotic options (3), M. abscessus lung disease is considered a chronic, incurable infection for most patients, and the sputum culture conversion rates are low (8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of current antibiotic options (3), M. abscessus lung disease is considered a chronic, incurable infection for most patients, and the sputum culture conversion rates are low (8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite treatment combining clarithromycin, amikacin, and cefoxitin or imipenem, failures were still observed in 20 to 73% of cases (24)(25)(26). These failures can be attributed to inducible production of 23S RNA methylase encoded by erm (41) or to the acquisition of resistance due to rrl mutations or other mechanisms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response rates for macrolide-based antibiotic therapy are much higher among patients with M. massiliense lung disease than among those with M. abscessus lung disease (8)(9)(10). This is likely due to the presence of a functional ribosomal methyl transferase erm (41) gene in M. abscessus, which results in inducible macrolide resistance, observed as susceptibility to macrolides at day 3 but resistance at day 14 of drug susceptibility testing (DST).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%