2018 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/energycon.2018.8398836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing neural architectures for demand response through model-free reinforcement learning for heat pump control

Abstract: As batch reinforcement learning algorithms reach maturity and neural networks are used increasingly in reinforcement learning, a performance comparison of these models should be performed. This paper discusses the implementation of a heat pump agent in a demand response setting and its cost effectiveness when implemented with different neural network types. The agent maintains the interior air temperature of a building between pre-set temperature constraints, with four actions at its disposal. The agent is inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a first application, Ruelens et al [1] illustrate that a RL method called Fitted Q-Iteration (FQI) reduces the electricity consumption cost of an Electric Water Heater (EWH) by 24 %, when charged with Belgian day-ahead electricity prices. Similar results have been obtained for spaceheating [3,4]. In a second application, De Somer et al [5] use EWH storage and FQI for local photovoltaic (PV) selfconsumption.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…In a first application, Ruelens et al [1] illustrate that a RL method called Fitted Q-Iteration (FQI) reduces the electricity consumption cost of an Electric Water Heater (EWH) by 24 %, when charged with Belgian day-ahead electricity prices. Similar results have been obtained for spaceheating [3,4]. In a second application, De Somer et al [5] use EWH storage and FQI for local photovoltaic (PV) selfconsumption.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The authors report energy savings of 13 and 23% and lowered discomfort ratings by 62 and 80% in the two buildings tested. In a 2018 study, Patyn et al compared the performance difference of Q learning on three different neural network architectures (convolutional neural networks (CNN), LSTM networks and a feed forward multi-layer neural network) for HVAC control [73]. Their results indicate that the LSTM and multi-layer network perform best however the LSTM training time was twice as long.…”
Section: Hvacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [26], De Somer et al demonstrated a data-driven control approach for DR in residential buildings, using RL to optimally schedule the heating cycles of domestic hot water buffers to maximize the self-consumption of local photovoltaic production. In [27], Patyn et al discussed the implementation of RL for heat pumps in a DR setting and its cost-effectiveness in comparison to different types of neural networks. The increasing utilization of EVs holds a great DR potential by their electrical storage capacity as well as their inherent connectivity [21].…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%